Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of Brain Networks based on Predictive Models of Connectivity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.08763 v2 pith:EWOIFDDJ submitted 2018-11-19 q-bio.NC

classification q-bio.NC
keywords connectivityfunctionalperformancepredictivesccaacrossapproachbrain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study we adopt predictive modelling to identify simultaneously commonalities and differences in multi-modal brain networks acquired within subjects. Typically, predictive modelling of functional connectomes from structural connectomes explores commonalities across multimodal imaging data. However, direct application of multivariate approaches such as sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis (sCCA) applies on the vectorised elements of functional connectivity across subjects and it does not guarantee that the predicted models of functional connectivity are Symmetric Positive Matrices (SPD). We suggest an elegant solution based on the transportation of the connectivity matrices on a Riemannian manifold, which notably improves the prediction performance of the model. Randomised lasso is used to alleviate the dependency of the sCCA on the lasso parameters and control the false positive rate. Subsequently, the binomial distribution is exploited to set a threshold statistic that reflects whether a connection is selected or rejected by chance. Finally, we estimate the sCCA loadings based on a de-noising approach that improves the estimation of the coefficients. We validate our approach based on resting-state fMRI and diffusion weighted MRI data. Quantitative validation of the prediction performance shows superior performance, whereas qualitative results of the identification process are promising.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools