pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1811.09603 · v3 · submitted 2018-11-23 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Impact of polarization observables and B_cto τ ν on new physics explanations of the bto c τ ν anomaly

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords lambdalimitconstraintdataimpactphysicsscenarioaggressive
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The combined analysis of the BaBar, Belle, and LHCb data on $B\to D\tau\nu$, $B\to D^*\tau\nu$ and $B_c\to J/\Psi\tau\nu$ decay observables shows evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). In this article, we study all the one- and two-dimensional scenarios which can be generated by adding a single new particle to the SM. We put special emphasis on the model-discriminating power of $F_L(D^*)$ and of the $\tau$ polarizations, and especially on the constraint from the branching fraction ${\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu)$. We critically review this constraint and do not support the aggressive limit of ${\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu)<10\%$ used in some analyses. While the impact of $F_L(D^*)$ is currently still limited, the ${\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu)$ constraint has a significant impact: depending on whether one uses a limit of $60\%$, $30\%$ or $10\%$, the pull for new physics (NP) in scalar operators changes drastically. More specifically, for a conservative $60\%$ limit a scenario with scalar operators gives the best fit to data, while for an aggressive $10\%$ limit this scenario is strongly disfavored and the best fit is obtained in a scenario in which only a left-handed vector operator is generated. We find a sum rule for the branching ratios of $B\to D\tau\nu$, $B\to D^*\tau\nu$ and $\Lambda_b\to \Lambda_c\tau\nu$ which holds for any NP contribution to the Wilson coefficients. This sum rule entails an enhancement of ${\rm BR}(\Lambda_b\to \Lambda_c\tau\nu)$ over its SM prediction by $(24\pm 6)\%$ for the current $\mathcal{R}(D^{(*)})$ data.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Baryon-Meson Sum Rule for $b \to s \nu\bar\nu$

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An exact sum rule connects branching fractions of Lambda_b -> Lambda nu nubar and B -> K(*) nu nubar decays with coefficients identical to those in the b->c tau semileptonic sum rule.

  2. $b \to c$ semileptonic sum rule: orbitally excited hadrons

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Sum rules for b→cτν transitions to orbitally excited charm hadrons show larger deviations from heavy quark symmetry than ground states, with tensor effects often sizable, but current form factor uncertainties prevent ...

  3. $b \to c$ semileptonic sum rule: SU(3)$_{\rm{F}}$ symmetry violation

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The SU(3) flavor symmetry violation in the extended b to c semileptonic sum rule is smaller than expected future experimental uncertainties, supporting new physics-agnostic consistency checks.

  4. A Phenomenological Study of Semileptonic $B^+$ and $B_s^0$ Decays into Axial-Vector Mesons $\big(D_1(2420),\, D_1^\prime(2430),\, D_{s1}(2460),\, \text{and } D_{s1}^\prime(2536)\big)$ within the Standard Model

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Semileptonic B decays to mixed axial-vector mesons show branching ratios and polarization observables that vary strongly with the D1 mixing angle in the covariant light-front quark model.

  5. $B$ anomalies and the tauphilic leptoquark model

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A tauphilic leptoquark model with S1 explaining R(D(*)), ~R2 fitting B to K nu nu via right-handed coefficients, and S3 satisfying Delta m_Bs via mixing predicts subdominant negative C_VL, dominant positive C_SL, C9^L...