Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Frustrated with Replicating Claims of a Shared Model? A Solution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.09737 v2 pith:RGDCJGNC submitted 2018-11-24 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords evaluationmodelpitfallsinnovationslearningmlmodelscoperapidreplicating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) innovations are being introduced at such a rapid pace that model owners and evaluators are hard-pressed analyzing and studying them. This is exacerbated by the complicated procedures for evaluation. The lack of standard systems and efficient techniques for specifying and provisioning ML/DL evaluation is the main cause of this "pain point". This work discusses common pitfalls for replicating DL model evaluation, and shows that these subtle pitfalls can affect both accuracy and performance. It then proposes a solution to remedy these pitfalls called MLModelScope, a specification for repeatable model evaluation and a runtime to provision and measure experiments. We show that by easing the model specification and evaluation process, MLModelScope facilitates rapid adoption of ML/DL innovations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools