REVIEW 2 cited by
Generative model benchmarks for superconducting qubits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this work we experimentally demonstrate how generative model training can be used as a benchmark for small ($<5$ qubits) quantum devices. Performance is quantified using three data analytic metrics: the Kullbeck-Leiber divergence, and two adaptations of the F1 score. Using the $2\times2$ Bars and Stripes dataset, we determine optimal circuit constructions for generative model training on superconducting qubits by including hardware connectivity constraints into circuit design. We show that on noisy hardware sparsely connected, shallow circuits out-perform denser counterparts.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Classical versus Quantum Models in Machine Learning: Insights from a Finance Application
Quantum circuit Born machines beat restricted Boltzmann machines with equal parameter counts on a finance-inspired generative modeling benchmark built from S&P 500 data.
-
Effects of Quantum Noise on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
For dephasing, bit-flip, and depolarizing noise on a 7-qubit Max-Cut QAOA, fidelity, cost, and gradients decay like (1-p)^(αN), and fitted optimal parameters stay close to noiseless values for Np<0.5.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.