Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Probability theory as a physical theory points to superdeterminism

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.10992 v5 pith:TRGMDMRS submitted 2018-11-27 physics.pop-ph math.HOquant-ph

classification physics.pop-phmath.HOquant-ph
keywords theorysuperdeterminismprobabilitymechanicsquantumadoptarguegeneral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Probability theory as a physical theory is, in a sense, the most general physics theory available, more encompassing than relativity theory and quantum mechanics, which comply with probability theory. Taking this simple fact seriously, I argue that probability theory points towards superdeterminism, a principle that underlies, notably, 't Hooft's Cellular Automaton Interpretation of quantum mechanics. Specifically, I argue that superdeterminism offers a solution for 1) Kolmogorov's problem of probabilistic dependence; 2) the interpretation of the Central Limit Theorem; and 3) Bell's theorem. Superdeterminism's competitor, indeterminism ('no hidden variables'), remains entirely silent regarding 1) and 2), and leaves 3) as an obstacle rather than a solution for the unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity. This suggests that, if one wishes to stick to the standard position in physics and adopt the principles with the highest explanatory power, one should adopt superdeterminism and reject indeterminism. Throughout the article precise questions to mathematicians are formulated to advance this research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools