Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

TIFTI: A Framework for Extracting Drug Intervals from Longitudinal Clinic Notes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.12793 v2 pith:T2WZ7FUP submitted 2018-11-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords treatmentexamplesintervalslabeledoralclinicdatedrug
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Oral drugs are becoming increasingly common in oncology care. In contrast to intravenous chemotherapy, which is administered in the clinic and carefully tracked via structure electronic health records (EHRs), oral drug treatment is self-administered and therefore not tracked as well. Often, the details of oral cancer treatment occur only in unstructured clinic notes. Extracting this information is critical to understanding a patient's treatment history. Yet, this a challenging task because treatment intervals must be inferred longitudinally from both explicit mentions in the text as well as from document timestamps. In this work, we present TIFTI (Temporally Integrated Framework for Treatment Intervals), a robust framework for extracting oral drug treatment intervals from a patient's unstructured notes. TIFTI leverages distinct sources of temporal information by breaking the problem down into two separate subtasks: document-level sequence labeling and date extraction. On a labeled dataset of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, it exactly matched the labeled start date in 46% of the examples (86% of the examples within 30 days), and it exactly matched the labeled end date in 52% of the examples (78% of the examples within 30 days). Without retraining, the model achieved a similar level of performance on a labeled dataset of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ensuring Reliability of Curated EHR-Derived Data: The Validation of Accuracy for LLM/ML-Extracted Information and Data (VALID) Framework

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The VALID framework combines human abstraction benchmarks, automated consistency checks, and replication analyses to evaluate LLM-extracted EHR data quality.

Pith tools