Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bang-bang control as a design principle for classical and quantum optimization algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.02746 v2 pith:7JFDEI7O submitted 2018-12-06 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumalgorithmsoptimizationalgorithmbang-bangcontrolinstancesqaoa
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Physically motivated classical heuristic optimization algorithms such as simulated annealing (SA) treat the objective function as an energy landscape, and allow walkers to escape local minima. It has been argued that quantum properties such as tunneling may give quantum algorithms advantage in finding ground states of vast, rugged cost landscapes. Indeed, the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm (QAO) and the recent Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) have shown promising results on various problem instances that are considered classically hard. Here, we argue that the type of control strategy used by the optimization algorithm may be crucial to its success. Along with SA, QAO and QAOA, we define a new, bang-bang version of simulated annealing, BBSA, and study the performance of these algorithms on two well-studied problem instances from the literature. Both classically and quantumly, the successful control strategy is found to be bang-bang, exponentially outperforming the quasistatic analogues on the same instances. Lastly, we construct O(1)-depth QAOA protocols for a class of symmetric cost functions, and provide an accompanying physical picture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A quantum algorithm to count weighted ground states of classical spin Hamiltonians

    quant-ph 2019-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    A modified AQO and QAOA for weighted ground-state counting is proposed, but factor errors in the estimator and inverted complexity scaling invalidate the claimed speedup.

  2. Training the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm without access to a Quantum Processing Unit

    quant-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper derives QAOA parameters from the infinite regular tree limit using tensor networks, so quantum hardware is only needed to sample the final state.

Pith tools