pith. sign in

arxiv: 1812.03789 · v4 · pith:OOVCB5OYnew · submitted 2018-12-10 · 💻 cs.AI

Abstracting Causal Models

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords abstractioncausalmodelsinterventionsnotionappliesrubensteinstates
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider a sequence of successively more restrictive definitions of abstraction for causal models, starting with a notion introduced by Rubenstein et al. (2017) called exact transformation that applies to probabilistic causal models, moving to a notion of uniform transformation that applies to deterministic causal models and does not allow differences to be hidden by the "right" choice of distribution, and then to abstraction, where the interventions of interest are determined by the map from low-level states to high-level states, and strong abstraction, which takes more seriously all potential interventions in a model, not just the allowed interventions. We show that procedures for combining micro-variables into macro-variables are instances of our notion of strong abstraction, as are all the examples considered by Rubenstein et al.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Approximate Causal Abstraction

    cs.AI 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Extends exact causal abstraction to approximate abstractions for causal models, including probabilistic versions, to handle discrepancies between abstraction levels.