Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Audio Captcha Recognition Using RastaPLP Features by SVM

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.02153 v1 pith:V5YR2GOM submitted 2019-01-08 cs.LG cs.SDeess.ASstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.SDeess.ASstat.ML
keywords audiocaptchashumancomputersoundableconsistdigits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Nowadays, CAPTCHAs are computer generated tests that human can pass but current computer systems can not. They have common usage in various web services in order to be able to detect a human from computer programs autonomously. In this way, owners can protect their web services from bots. In addition to visual CAPTCHAs which consist of distorted images, mostly test images, that a user must write some description about that image, there are a significant amount of audio CAPTCHAs as well. Briefly, audio CAPTCHAs are sound files which consist of human sound under heavy noise where the speaker pronounces a bunch of digits consecutively. Generally, in those sound files, there are some periodic and non-periodic noises to get difficult to recognize them with a program but not for a human listener. We gathered numerous randomly collected audio file to train and then test them using our SVM algorithm to be able to extract digits out of each conversation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Moravec's Paradox: Towards an Auditory Turing Test

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes an auditory Turing test of 917 challenges and reports that the best tested AI model, GPT-4o audio, scores 6.9% versus 52% for a nine-person human sample.

Pith tools