REVIEW 1 cited by
Quantifying the uncertainties on spinodal instability in stellar matter through meta-modeling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The influence of the uncertainties of the equation of state empirical parameters on the neutron stars crust-core phase transition is explored within a meta-modeling approach, in which the energy per particle is expanded as a Taylor series in density and asymmetry around the saturation point. The phase transition point is estimated from the intersection of the spinodal instability region for dynamical fluctuations with the chemical equilibrium curve. Special attention is paid to the inclusion of high-order parameters of the Taylor series and their influence on the transition point. An uncorrelated prior distribution is considered for the empirical parameters, with bulk properties constrained through effective field theory predictions, while the surface parameters are controlled from a fit of nuclear masses using the extended Thomas Fermi approximation. The results show that the isovector compressibility $K_{sym}$ and skewness $Q_{sym}$ have the most significant correlations with the transition point, along with the previously observed influence of the $L_{sym}$ parameter. The estimated density and pressure of the crust-core transition are $n_t = (0.071 \pm 0.011) fm^{-3}$ and $P_t = (0.294 \pm 0.102) MeV fm^{-3}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bayesian inference of neutron star crust properties using an ab initio-benchmarked meta-model
A blended meta-model with ab initio-based low-density correction reduces neutron star crust uncertainties and shifts crust-core transition density, pressure, and crustal moment of inertia in Bayesian inference.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.