Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Proposition of an implementation framework enabling benchmarking of Holonic Manufacturing Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.05669 v1 pith:KFJQLPFM submitted 2019-01-17 cs.MA

Proposition of an implementation framework enabling benchmarking of Holonic Manufacturing Systems

classification cs.MA
keywords benchmarkingarchitecturedevelopmentsevaluationfeaturesgenericholonicliterature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Performing an overview of the benchmarking initiatives oriented towards the performance evaluation of Holonic Manufacturing Systems shows that there are very few of them. However, a comparison between all the isolated emu-lation developments for benchmarking in literature was made, and showed that many common features could be extracted. Several deadlocks for a generic approach of these developments are also exhibited. A global architecture dedicated to a generic performance evaluation platform design is suggested. This architecture integrates a scenario manager, whose main specificities were detailed and justified. Those features are meant to both integrate the best practices encountered in literature and fulfil the missing aspects to respond to the problematics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Does Hierarchy Help? Benchmarking Agent Coordination in Event-Driven Industrial Scheduling

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DESBench reveals structural trade-offs among centralized, hierarchical, heterarchical, and holonic coordination in dynamic industrial scheduling that outcome metrics alone miss.