Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.08971 v3 pith:KAVTGVC7 submitted 2019-01-25 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords benchmarkdetectionfacialforgeryavailablecompressiondetectimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid progress in synthetic image generation and manipulation has now come to a point where it raises significant concerns for the implications towards society. At best, this leads to a loss of trust in digital content, but could potentially cause further harm by spreading false information or fake news. This paper examines the realism of state-of-the-art image manipulations, and how difficult it is to detect them, either automatically or by humans. To standardize the evaluation of detection methods, we propose an automated benchmark for facial manipulation detection. In particular, the benchmark is based on DeepFakes, Face2Face, FaceSwap and NeuralTextures as prominent representatives for facial manipulations at random compression level and size. The benchmark is publicly available and contains a hidden test set as well as a database of over 1.8 million manipulated images. This dataset is over an order of magnitude larger than comparable, publicly available, forgery datasets. Based on this data, we performed a thorough analysis of data-driven forgery detectors. We show that the use of additional domainspecific knowledge improves forgery detection to unprecedented accuracy, even in the presence of strong compression, and clearly outperforms human observers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tell me Habibi, is it Real or Fake?

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ArEnAV, the first large-scale Arabic-English code-switched audio-visual deepfake dataset, makes current state-of-the-art detectors fail much more than on monolingual data.

  2. XPlainVerse: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A million-scale deepfake benchmark with Edit-Check filtering, dual expert/lay explanations, and EntityScore/EvidenceScore shows fine-tuned detectors collapse under generator shift while surface fluency remains.

  3. Continuously Evolving Deepfake Detection: An Architecture and Public-Benchmark Evaluation of a Dynamic Detection System

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A continuously refreshed, incentive-driven deepfake detector beats static detectors on in-the-wild benchmarks and improves on post-export AI-generated media.

Pith tools