Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tensor Robust Principal Component Analysis: Better recovery with atomic norm regularization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.10991 v1 pith:O57XCZXC submitted 2019-01-30 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords atomic-normguaranteesnonconvexperformanceregularizationtensoranalysisbetter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper studies tensor-based Robust Principal Component Analysis (RPCA) using atomic-norm regularization. Given the superposition of a sparse and a low-rank tensor, we present conditions under which it is possible to exactly recover the sparse and low-rank components. Our results improve on existing performance guarantees for tensor-RPCA, including those for matrix RPCA. Our guarantees also show that atomic-norm regularization provides better recovery for tensor-structured data sets than other approaches based on matricization. In addition to these performance guarantees, we study a nonconvex formulation of the tensor atomic-norm and identify a class of local minima of this nonconvex program that are globally optimal. We demonstrate the strong performance of our approach in numerical experiments, where we show that our nonconvex model reliably recovers tensors with ranks larger than all of their side lengths, significantly outperforming other algorithms that require matricization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the hardness of deterministic second-order optimization of functions with Lipschitz gradients

    math.OC 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    No deterministic zero-respecting second-order algorithm can compute Goldstein approximate second-order stationary points of C^{1,1} functions within finitely many oracle calls; general deterministic algorithms need at...

Pith tools