The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examples
read the original abstract
We investigate conditions under which test statistics exist that can reliably detect examples, which have been adversarially manipulated in a white-box attack. These statistics can be easily computed and calibrated by randomly corrupting inputs. They exploit certain anomalies that adversarial attacks introduce, in particular if they follow the paradigm of choosing perturbations optimally under p-norm constraints. Access to the log-odds is the only requirement to defend models. We justify our approach empirically, but also provide conditions under which detectability via the suggested test statistics is guaranteed to be effective. In our experiments, we show that it is even possible to correct test time predictions for adversarial attacks with high accuracy.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Defending Adversarial Attacks by Correcting logits
A two-layer network trained on mixed clean and perturbed logits recovers original predictions for a range of adversarial attacks without needing image data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.