REVIEW 2 cited by
On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Deep learning, due to its unprecedented success in tasks such as image classification, has emerged as a new tool in image reconstruction with potential to change the field. In this paper we demonstrate a crucial phenomenon: deep learning typically yields unstablemethods for image reconstruction. The instabilities usually occur in several forms: (1) tiny, almost undetectable perturbations, both in the image and sampling domain, may result in severe artefacts in the reconstruction, (2) a small structural change, for example a tumour, may not be captured in the reconstructed image and (3) (a counterintuitive type of instability) more samples may yield poorer performance. Our new stability test with algorithms and easy to use software detects the instability phenomena. The test is aimed at researchers to test their networks for instabilities and for government agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to secure safe use of deep learning methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Data Consistent Artifact Reduction for Limited Angle Tomography with Deep Learning Prior
A data consistent artifact reduction method that couples a U-Net prior with iterative reconstruction reduces RMSE by over 10% (noise-free) and over 24% (noisy) in simulated 120 degree cone-beam limited angle tomography.
-
Parametric Majorization for Data-Driven Energy Minimization Methods
Parametric majorizers replace a bi-level training problem with single-level surrogate losses that upper-bound the original objective, enabling efficient learning of energy-based models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.