Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Unstable Motivic Homotopy Theory

Algebraic Topology · Submitted 23 Feb 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We give an introduction to unstable motivic homotopy theory of Morel and Voevodsky, and survey some results.

how it is stated · asserted 0.88 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1902.08857 (version 1)
Pith IDNOHVPRI6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBen Williams, Kirsten Wickelgren. "Unstable Motivic Homotopy Theory." arXiv:1902.08857 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/NOHVPRI6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,584 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We give an introduction to unstable motivic homotopy theory of Morel and Voevodsky, and survey some results.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We give an introduction to unstable motivic homotopy theory of Morel and Voevodsky, and survey some results. contribution 0.96 0.53 0.19 asserted 0.88

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from literature 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We give an introduction to unstable motivic homotopy theory of Morel and Voevodsky, and survey some results.

Human review
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 6 papers
  • We do not use its formal definition and refer the interested reader to [ref] for the definition and to [ref] for an introduction to $^1$-homotopy theory.

    Computing A1-Euler numbers with Macaulay2 · Definition of the $^1$-Euler number · 0.99

  • The $^1$-degree, first defined by Morel [ref] , provides a foundational tool for solving problems in $^1$-enumerative geometry[For the sake of brevity, we neglect to include exposition of the basic notions used in $^1$-enumerative geometry; instead we refer the reader to the expository paper [ref] , as well as the exposition found throughout the following papers: [ref] .], a field which seeks to resolve enumerative questions over arbitrary fields by wielding the machinery of $^1$-homotopy theory [ref] .

    The trace of the local $\mathbf{A}^1$-degree · Introduction · 1.00

  • For more information about Grothendieck-Witt rings, see [ref] .

    On the EKL-Degree of a Weyl Cover · The Grothendieck-Witt Ring · 1.00

What it cites · 19 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.