Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MaskDGA: A Black-box Evasion Technique Against DGA Classifiers and Adversarial Defenses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.08909 v1 pith:IQDEWMWB submitted 2019-02-24 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords classifiersadversarialcharacter-leveldomainmaskdganamestechniqueadditional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Domain generation algorithms (DGAs) are commonly used by botnets to generate domain names through which bots can establish a resilient communication channel with their command and control servers. Recent publications presented deep learning, character-level classifiers that are able to detect algorithmically generated domain (AGD) names with high accuracy, and correspondingly, significantly reduce the effectiveness of DGAs for botnet communication. In this paper we present MaskDGA, a practical adversarial learning technique that adds perturbation to the character-level representation of algorithmically generated domain names in order to evade DGA classifiers, without the attacker having any knowledge about the DGA classifier's architecture and parameters. MaskDGA was evaluated using the DMD-2018 dataset of AGD names and four recently published DGA classifiers, in which the average F1-score of the classifiers degrades from 0.977 to 0.495 when applying the evasion technique. An additional evaluation was conducted using the same classifiers but with adversarial defenses implemented: adversarial re-training and distillation. The results of this evaluation show that MaskDGA can be used for improving the robustness of the character-level DGA classifiers against adversarial attacks, but that ideally DGA classifiers should incorporate additional features alongside character-level features that are demonstrated in this study to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comprehensive Survey on Adversarial Examples in Cybersecurity: Impacts, Challenges, and Mitigation Strategies

    cs.CR 2024-12 conditional

    A review summarizing adversarial example attacks and defenses in cybersecurity, with duplicated references and no new experimental results.

Pith tools