Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey of Visuo-Haptic Simulation in Surgical Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.03272 v1 pith:6DSAIAGJ submitted 2019-03-08 cs.HC cs.RO

classification cs.HCcs.RO
keywords trainingsurgicalsimulationsvisuo-hapticresearchscenariossurgeonsaccomplish
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Surgeons must accomplish complex technical and intellectual tasks that can generate unexpected and serious challenges with little or no room for error. In the last decade, computer simulations have played an increasing role in surgical training, pre-operative planning, and biomedical research. Specifically, visuo-haptic simulations have been the focus of research to develop advanced e-Learning systems facilitating surgical training. The cost of haptic hardware was reduced through mass scale production and as haptics gained popularity in the gaming industry. Visuo-haptic simulations combine the tactile sense with visual information and provide training scenarios with a high degree of reality. For surgical training, such scenarios can be used as ways to gain, improve, and assess resident and expert surgeons' skills and knowledge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Implementation and Assessment of an Augmented Training Curriculum for Surgical Robotics

    cs.RO 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A small pilot study claims haptic-assisted virtual-reality training improves skill transfer in surgical robotics, but n=4 per group and a flawed performance score undermine the finding.

Pith tools