RECORD
Solar activity: intrinsic periodicities beyond 11 years
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 13 Mar 2019
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Using this model as a null case, we show here that all local peaks with enhanced power, apart from the 11-year band, are consistent with realisation noise.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Power spectra of solar activity based on historical records of sunspot numbers and on cosmogenic isotopes show peaks with enhanced power apart from the dominant 11-year solar cycle, such as the 90-year Gleissberg cycle or the 210-year de Vries cycle. In a previous paper we have shown that the overall shape of the power spectrum is well represented by the results of the generic normal form model for a noisy and weakly nonlinear limit cycle, with parameters all determined by observations. Using this model as a null case, we show here that all local peaks with enhanced power, apart from the 11-year band, are consistent with realisation noise. Even a $3\sigma$ peak is expected to occur with a probability of about 0.25 at least once among the 216 period bins resolved by the cosmogenic isotope data. This casts doubt upon interpretations of such peaks in terms of intrinsic periodicities of the solar dynamo process.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Power spectra of solar activity based on historical records of sunspot numbers and on cosmogenic isotopes show peaks with enhanced power apart from the dominant 11-year solar cycle, such as the 90-year Gleissberg cycle or the 210-year de Vries cycle. | background 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | In a previous paper we have shown that the overall shape of the power spectrum is well represented by the results of the generic normal form model for a noisy and weakly nonlinear limit cycle, with parameters all determined by observations. | background 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Using this model as a null case, we show here that all local peaks with enhanced power, apart from the 11-year band, are consistent with realisation noise. | result 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.88 | asserted 0.73 |
| s3 | Even a $3\sigma$ peak is expected to occur with a probability of about 0.25 at least once among the 216 period bins resolved by the cosmogenic isotope data. | result 0.89 | 0.63 | 0.08 | asserted 0.82 |
| s4 | This casts doubt upon interpretations of such peaks in terms of intrinsic periodicities of the solar dynamo process. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.63 | hedged possibility 0.86 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Power spectra of solar activity based on historical records of sunspot numbers and on cosmogenic isotopes show peaks with enhanced power apart from the dominant 11-year solar cycle, such as the 90-year Gleissberg cycle or the 210-year de Vries cycle. In a previous paper we have shown that the overall shape of the power spectrum is well represented by the results of the generic normal form model for a noisy and weakly nonlinear limit cycle, with parameters all determined by observations. Using this model as a null case, we show here that all local peaks with enhanced power, apart from the 11-year band, are consistent with realisation noise. Even a $3\sigma$ peak is expected to occur with a probability of about 0.25 at least once among the 216 period bins resolved by the cosmogenic isotope data. This casts doubt upon interpretations of such peaks in terms of intrinsic periodicities of the solar dynamo process.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.