REVIEW 2 cited by
Regularized Learning for Domain Adaptation under Label Shifts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose Regularized Learning under Label shifts (RLLS), a principled and a practical domain-adaptation algorithm to correct for shifts in the label distribution between a source and a target domain. We first estimate importance weights using labeled source data and unlabeled target data, and then train a classifier on the weighted source samples. We derive a generalization bound for the classifier on the target domain which is independent of the (ambient) data dimensions, and instead only depends on the complexity of the function class. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first generalization bound for the label-shift problem where the labels in the target domain are not available. Based on this bound, we propose a regularized estimator for the small-sample regime which accounts for the uncertainty in the estimated weights. Experiments on the CIFAR-10 and MNIST datasets show that RLLS improves classification accuracy, especially in the low sample and large-shift regimes, compared to previous methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Survival analysis under label shift
The paper proposes an approximate-likelihood estimator for parametric survival models in a target population under label shift, using nonparametric estimates of the source survival and target covariate distributions, ...
-
Calibrated and Robust Foundation Models for Vision-Language and Medical Image Tasks Under Distribution Shift
StaRFM reuses the authors' earlier CalShift penalties, extends them to 3D medical segmentation with patch-wise and voxel-wise variants, and claims large gains that are not consistently supported by the paper's own tables.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.