Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A nonextensive insight to the stellar initial mass function

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 30 Mar 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim the present paper, we propose that the stellar initial mass distributions as known as IMF are best fitted by $q$-Weibulls that emerge within nonextensive statistical mechanics.

how it is stated · asserted 0.77 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1904.00253 (version 1)
Pith IDCFPQ7UPH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD. B. de Freitas, J. R. P. Da Silva, M. M. F. Nepomuceno, R. T. Eufrasio. "A nonextensive insight to the stellar initial mass function." arXiv:1904.00253 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/CFPQ7UPH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,985 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.17 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.71 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

the present paper, we propose that the stellar initial mass distributions as known as IMF are best fitted by $q$-Weibulls that emerge within nonextensive statistical mechanics. As a result, we show that the Salpeter's slope of $\sim$2.35 is replaced when a $q$-Weibull distribution is used. Our results point out that the nonextensive entropic index $q$ represents a new approach for understanding the process of the star-forming and evolution of massive stars.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 the present paper, we propose that the stellar initial mass distributions as known as IMF are best fitted by $q$-Weibulls that emerge within nonextensive statistical mechanics. contribution 0.97 0.62 0.66 asserted 0.77
s1 As a result, we show that the Salpeter's slope of $\sim$2.35 is replaced when a $q$-Weibull distribution is used. result 1.00 0.89 0.26 asserted 1.00
s2 Our results point out that the nonextensive entropic index $q$ represents a new approach for understanding the process of the star-forming and evolution of massive stars. interpretation 1.00 0.83 0.50 hedged possibility 0.75

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.86 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.68.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

the present paper, we propose that the stellar initial mass distributions as known as IMF are best fitted by $q$-Weibulls that emerge within nonextensive statistical mechanics. As a result, we show that the Salpeter's slope of $\sim$2.35 is replaced when a $q$-Weibull distribution is used. Our results point out that the nonextensive entropic index $q$ represents a new approach for understanding the process of the star-forming and evolution of massive stars.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.