RECORD
Evolution of Coronal Cavity from Quiescent to Eruptive Phase in Association with Coronal Mass Ejection
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 1 Apr 2019
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim By comparing the decay-index profiles of the cavity system during the different stages of its quiescent and pre-eruptive phases we find that the decay-index value at the cavity centroid height can be used as a good indicator to predict the cavity eruption in the context of torus instability.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present the evolution of a coronal cavity encompassing its quiescent and eruptive phases in the lower corona. Using the multi-vantage point observations from the SDO/AIA, STEREO SECCHI/EUVI and PROBA2/SWAP EUV imagers, we capture the sequence of quasi-static equilibria of the quiescent cavity which exhibited a slow rise and expansion phase during its passage on the solar disc from 2010 May 30 to 2010 June 13. By comparing the decay-index profiles of the cavity system during the different stages of its quiescent and pre-eruptive phases we find that the decay-index value at the cavity centroid height can be used as a good indicator to predict the cavity eruption in the context of torus instability. Combining the observations of SWAP and LASCO C2/C3 we show the evolution of the EUV cavity into the white-light cavity as a three-part structure of the associated CME observed to erupt on 2010 June 13. By applying successive geometrical fits to the cavity morphology we find that the cavity exhibited non self-similar expansion in the lower corona, below 2.2 +/- 0.2 Rs, which points to the spatial scale for the radius of source surface where the coronal magnetic field lines are believed to become radial. Furthermore, the kinematic study of the erupting cavity captures both the "impulsive" and "residual" phases of acceleration along with a strong deflection of the cavity at 1.3 Rs. We also discuss the role of driving forces behind the dynamics of the morphological and kinematic evolution of the cavity.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present the evolution of a coronal cavity encompassing its quiescent and eruptive phases in the lower corona. | contribution 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.09 | asserted 0.94 |
| s1 | Using the multi-vantage point observations from the SDO/AIA, STEREO SECCHI/EUVI and PROBA2/SWAP EUV imagers, we capture the sequence of quasi-static equilibria of the quiescent cavity which exhibited a slow rise and expansion phase during its passage on the solar disc from 2010 May 30 to 2010 June 13. | method 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | By comparing the decay-index profiles of the cavity system during the different stages of its quiescent and pre-eruptive phases we find that the decay-index value at the cavity centroid height can be used as a good indicator to predict the cavity eruption in the context of torus instability. | result 0.88 | 0.97 | 0.54 | asserted 0.98 |
| s3 | Combining the observations of SWAP and LASCO C2/C3 we show the evolution of the EUV cavity into the white-light cavity as a three-part structure of the associated CME observed to erupt on 2010 June 13. | result 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | By applying successive geometrical fits to the cavity morphology we find that the cavity exhibited non self-similar expansion in the lower corona, below 2.2 +/- 0.2 Rs, which points to the spatial scale for the radius of source surface where the coronal magnetic field lines are believed to become radial. | result 0.79 | 0.96 | 0.10 | asserted 0.56 |
| s5 | Furthermore, the kinematic study of the erupting cavity captures both the "impulsive" and "residual" phases of acceleration along with a strong deflection of the cavity at 1.3 Rs. | result 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | We also discuss the role of driving forces behind the dynamics of the morphological and kinematic evolution of the cavity. | interpretation 0.57 | 0.66 | 0.05 | unclear 0.91 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We present the evolution of a coronal cavity encompassing its quiescent and eruptive phases in the lower corona. Using the multi-vantage point observations from the SDO/AIA, STEREO SECCHI/EUVI and PROBA2/SWAP EUV imagers, we capture the sequence of quasi-static equilibria of the quiescent cavity which exhibited a slow rise and expansion phase during its passage on the solar disc from 2010 May 30 to 2010 June 13. By comparing the decay-index profiles of the cavity system during the different stages of its quiescent and pre-eruptive phases we find that the decay-index value at the cavity centroid height can be used as a good indicator to predict the cavity eruption in the context of torus instability. Combining the observations of SWAP and LASCO C2/C3 we show the evolution of the EUV cavity into the white-light cavity as a three-part structure of the associated CME observed to erupt on 2010 June 13. By applying successive geometrical fits to the cavity morphology we find that the cavity exhibited non self-similar expansion in the lower corona, below 2.2 +/- 0.2 Rs, which points to the spatial scale for the radius of source surface where the coronal magnetic field lines are believed to become radial. Furthermore, the kinematic study of the erupting cavity captures both the "impulsive" and "residual" phases of acceleration along with a strong deflection of the cavity at 1.3 Rs. We also discuss the role of driving forces behind the dynamics of the morphological and kinematic evolution of the cavity.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.