Pith. Sign in

RECORD

An Analysis Framework for Hardware and Software Implementations with Applications from Cryptography

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing · Submitted 30 Mar 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This paper confirms that a unified statistical framework can successfully classify algorithms based on a combination of the heterogeneous characteristics of their hardware and software implementations.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1904.01000 (version 1)
Pith IDMOXJSQZO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation(2) Lebanese American University), American University of Kuwait, Issam Damaj (1), Safaa Kasbah (2) ((1). "An Analysis Framework for Hardware and Software Implementations with Applications from Cryptography." arXiv:1904.01000 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/MOXJSQZO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,521 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.12 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

With the richness of present-day hardware architectures, tightening the synergy between hardware and software has attracted a great attention. The interest in unified approaches paved the way for newborn frameworks that target hardware and software co-design. This paper confirms that a unified statistical framework can successfully classify algorithms based on a combination of the heterogeneous characteristics of their hardware and software implementations. The proposed framework produces customizable indicators for any hybridization of processing systems and can be contextualized for any area of application. The framework is used to develop the Lightness Indicator System (LIS) as a case-study that targets a set of cryptographic algorithms that are known in the literature to be tiny and light. The LIS targets state-of-the-art multi-core processors and high-end Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). The presented work includes a generic benchmark model that aids the clear presentation of the framework and extensive performance analysis and evaluation.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 With the richness of present-day hardware architectures, tightening the synergy between hardware and software has attracted a great attention. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 The interest in unified approaches paved the way for newborn frameworks that target hardware and software co-design. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 This paper confirms that a unified statistical framework can successfully classify algorithms based on a combination of the heterogeneous characteristics of their hardware and software implementations. result 0.81 0.86 0.89 asserted 0.99
s3 The proposed framework produces customizable indicators for any hybridization of processing systems and can be contextualized for any area of application. contribution 0.87 0.75 0.11 asserted 0.98
s4 The framework is used to develop the Lightness Indicator System (LIS) as a case-study that targets a set of cryptographic algorithms that are known in the literature to be tiny and light. contribution 0.78 0.89 0.05 asserted 0.99
s5 The LIS targets state-of-the-art multi-core processors and high-end Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). contribution 0.67 0.51 0.03 asserted 1.00
s6 The presented work includes a generic benchmark model that aids the clear presentation of the framework and extensive performance analysis and evaluation. method 0.66 0.90 0.04 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.49.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

With the richness of present-day hardware architectures, tightening the synergy between hardware and software has attracted a great attention. The interest in unified approaches paved the way for newborn frameworks that target hardware and software co-design. This paper confirms that a unified statistical framework can successfully classify algorithms based on a combination of the heterogeneous characteristics of their hardware and software implementations. The proposed framework produces customizable indicators for any hybridization of processing systems and can be contextualized for any area of application. The framework is used to develop the Lightness Indicator System (LIS) as a case-study that targets a set of cryptographic algorithms that are known in the literature to be tiny and light. The LIS targets state-of-the-art multi-core processors and high-end Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). The presented work includes a generic benchmark model that aids the clear presentation of the framework and extensive performance analysis and evaluation.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.