Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring the Attack Surface of Blockchain: A Systematic Overview

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.03487 v1 pith:UR4JK357 submitted 2019-04-06 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords attacksblockchainattackdistributedsurfacedenial-of-serviceexploreselfish
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we systematically explore the attack surface of the Blockchain technology, with an emphasis on public Blockchains. Towards this goal, we attribute attack viability in the attack surface to 1) the Blockchain cryptographic constructs, 2) the distributed architecture of the systems using Blockchain, and 3) the Blockchain application context. To each of those contributing factors, we outline several attacks, including selfish mining, the 51% attack, Domain Name System (DNS) attacks, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, consensus delay (due to selfish behavior or distributed denial-of-service attacks), Blockchain forks, orphaned and stale blocks, block ingestion, wallet thefts, smart contract attacks, and privacy attacks. We also explore the causal relationships between these attacks to demonstrate how various attack vectors are connected to one another. A secondary contribution of this work is outlining effective defense measures taken by the Blockchain technology or proposed by researchers to mitigate the effects of these attacks and patch associated vulnerabilities

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Formal Security Analysis of SPV Clients Versus Home-Based Full Nodes in Bitcoin-Derived Systems

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    This formal model claims SPV clients match or beat non-mining full nodes on security, but its key axioms assume the conclusion.

Pith tools