Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Distributed Consensus Protocols for Blockchain Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.04098 v4 pith:UWRWUZ74 submitted 2019-04-08 cs.CR cs.DC

classification cs.CRcs.DC
keywords consensusblockchainprotocolsblockperformanceprotocolsurveyanalyses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Since the inception of Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies and the underlying blockchain technology have attracted an increasing interest from both academia and industry. Among various core components, consensus protocol is the defining technology behind the security and performance of blockchain. From incremental modifications of Nakamoto consensus protocol to innovative alternative consensus mechanisms, many consensus protocols have been proposed to improve the performance of the blockchain network itself or to accommodate other specific application needs. In this survey, we present a comprehensive review and analysis on the state-of-the-art blockchain consensus protocols. To facilitate the discussion of our analysis, we first introduce the key definitions and relevant results in the classic theory of fault tolerance which help to lay the foundation for further discussion. We identify five core components of a blockchain consensus protocol, namely, block proposal, block validation, information propagation, block finalization, and incentive mechanism. A wide spectrum of blockchain consensus protocols are then carefully reviewed accompanied by algorithmic abstractions and vulnerability analyses. The surveyed consensus protocols are analyzed using the five-component framework and compared with respect to different performance metrics. These analyses and comparisons provide us new insights in the fundamental differences of various proposals in terms of their suitable application scenarios, key assumptions, expected fault tolerance, scalability, drawbacks and trade-offs. We believe this survey will provide blockchain developers and researchers a comprehensive view on the state-of-the-art consensus protocols and facilitate the process of designing future protocols.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Agent-based Simulation of Blockchains

    cs.CR 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    This paper introduces LUNES-Blockchain, an agent-based PADS simulator for blockchains, and demonstrates it on a simplified Bitcoin model under a filtering DoS, but provides no parallel speedup measurements.

  2. A Survey on Ethereum Systems Security: Vulnerabilities, Attacks and Defenses

    cs.CR 2019-08 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review that enumerates and classifies 44 Ethereum vulnerabilities, 26 attacks, and 47 defenses with root-cause and consequence analysis.

Pith tools