Pith. sign in

REVIEW

DeepRadioID: Real-Time Channel-Resilient Optimization of Deep Learning-based Radio Fingerprinting Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.07623 v1 pith:DJ6XDGOS submitted 2019-04-16 cs.NI

DeepRadioID: Real-Time Channel-Resilient Optimization of Deep Learning-based Radio Fingerprinting Algorithms

classification cs.NI
keywords fingerprintingaccuracyalgorithmsdeepdeepradioidradiodevicedevices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Radio fingerprinting provides a reliable and energy-efficient IoT authentication strategy. By mapping inputs onto a very large feature space, deep learning algorithms can be trained to fingerprint large populations of devices operating under any wireless standard. One of the most crucial challenges in radio fingerprinting is to counteract the action of the wireless channel, which decreases fingerprinting accuracy significantly by disrupting hardware impairments. On the other hand, due to their sheer size, deep learning algorithms are hardly re-trainable in real-time. Another aspect that is yet to be investigated is whether an adversary can successfully impersonate another device fingerprint. To address these key issues, this paper proposes DeepRadioID, a system to optimize the accuracy of deep-learning-based radio fingerprinting algorithms without retraining the underlying deep learning model. We extensively evaluate DeepRadioID on a experimental testbed of 20 nominally-identical software-defined radios, as well as on two datasets made up by 500 ADS-B devices and by 500 WiFi devices provided by the DARPA RFMLS program. Experimental results show that DeepRadioID (i) increases fingerprinting accuracy by about 35%, 50% and 58% on the three scenarios considered; (ii) decreases an adversary's accuracy by about 54% when trying to imitate other device fingerprints by using their filters; (iii) achieves 27% improvement over the state of the art on a 100-device dataset.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.