Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Adaptive Reconstruction for Electrical Impedance Tomography with a Piecewise Constant Conductivity

Numerical Analysis · Submitted 18 Apr 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We prove the convergence of the adaptive algorithm in the following sense: the sequence of discrete solutions contains a subsequence convergent to a solution of the continuous necessary optimality system.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1904.08837 (version 1)
Pith IDLCLI67MZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBangti Jin, Yifeng Xu. "Adaptive Reconstruction for Electrical Impedance Tomography with a Piecewise Constant Conductivity." arXiv:1904.08837 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/LCLI67MZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,668 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this work we propose and analyze a numerical method for electrical impedance tomography of recovering a piecewise constant conductivity from boundary voltage measurements. It is based on standard Tikhonov regularization with a Modica-Mortola penalty functional and adaptive mesh refinement using suitable a posteriori error estimators of residual type that involve the state, adjoint and variational inequality in the necessary optimality condition and a separate marking strategy. We prove the convergence of the adaptive algorithm in the following sense: the sequence of discrete solutions contains a subsequence convergent to a solution of the continuous necessary optimality system. Several numerical examples are presented to illustrate the convergence behavior of the algorithm.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this work we propose and analyze a numerical method for electrical impedance tomography of recovering a piecewise constant conductivity from boundary voltage measurements. contribution 1.00 0.88 0.08 asserted 0.99
s1 It is based on standard Tikhonov regularization with a Modica-Mortola penalty functional and adaptive mesh refinement using suitable a posteriori error estimators of residual type that involve the state, adjoint and variational inequality in the necessary optimality condition and a separate marking strategy. method 0.99 0.82 0.05 asserted 1.00
s2 We prove the convergence of the adaptive algorithm in the following sense: the sequence of discrete solutions contains a subsequence convergent to a solution of the continuous necessary optimality system. result 0.89 0.95 0.66 asserted 1.00
s3 Several numerical examples are presented to illustrate the convergence behavior of the algorithm. contribution 0.43 0.93 0.06 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.66.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this work we propose and analyze a numerical method for electrical impedance tomography of recovering a piecewise constant conductivity from boundary voltage measurements. It is based on standard Tikhonov regularization with a Modica-Mortola penalty functional and adaptive mesh refinement using suitable a posteriori error estimators of residual type that involve the state, adjoint and variational inequality in the necessary optimality condition and a separate marking strategy. We prove the convergence of the adaptive algorithm in the following sense: the sequence of discrete solutions contains a subsequence convergent to a solution of the continuous necessary optimality system. Several numerical examples are presented to illustrate the convergence behavior of the algorithm.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • Then one linearized approximation $p_L(z,z_k)$ reads (with $δz=z-z_k$) [equation] Upon substituting the approximation $p_L(z,z_k)$ for $p(z)$ and linearizing the forward map $U(σ)$, we obtain the following surrogate energy functional (with $δσ=σ-σ_k$ being the increment and $δU= U^δ-U(σ_k)$) [equation] The treatment of the double well potential term $∫_ΩW(σ)dx$ is in the spirit of the classical majorization-minimization algorithm in the following sense (see [ref] for a detailed derivation) [equation] This algorithm is known to have excellent numerical stability.

    A Minimization Method for The Double-Well Energy Functional · The solution of the variational inequality · 0.93

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.