Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Investigating Prior Knowledge for Challenging Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.09679 v3 pith:EPDS2WJC submitted 2019-04-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgemachinepriorcomprehensionquestionsreadingchinesedataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine reading comprehension tasks require a machine reader to answer questions relevant to the given document. In this paper, we present the first free-form multiple-Choice Chinese machine reading Comprehension dataset (C^3), containing 13,369 documents (dialogues or more formally written mixed-genre texts) and their associated 19,577 multiple-choice free-form questions collected from Chinese-as-a-second-language examinations. We present a comprehensive analysis of the prior knowledge (i.e., linguistic, domain-specific, and general world knowledge) needed for these real-world problems. We implement rule-based and popular neural methods and find that there is still a significant performance gap between the best performing model (68.5%) and human readers (96.0%), especially on problems that require prior knowledge. We further study the effects of distractor plausibility and data augmentation based on translated relevant datasets for English on model performance. We expect C^3 to present great challenges to existing systems as answering 86.8% of questions requires both knowledge within and beyond the accompanying document, and we hope that C^3 can serve as a platform to study how to leverage various kinds of prior knowledge to better understand a given written or orally oriented text. C^3 is available at https://dataset.org/c3/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. UserGPT Technical Report

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    UserGPT introduces a generative LLM framework with a behavior simulation engine, semantization module, and DF-GRPO post-training that scores 0.7325 on tag prediction and 0.7528 on summary generation on HPR-Bench while...

  2. InternLM2 Technical Report

    cs.CL 2024-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    InternLM2 is a new open-source LLM that outperforms prior versions on 30 benchmarks and long-context tasks through scaled pre-training to 32k tokens and a conditional online RLHF alignment strategy.

Pith tools