REVIEW 2 cited by
Inspiralling eccentric binary neutron stars: orbital motion and tidal resonance
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We study the orbital evolution of eccentric binary neutron stars. The orbit is described as a Quasi-Keplarian orbit with perturbations due to tidal couplings. We find that the tidal interaction between stars contributes to orbital precession, in addition to the Post-Newtonian procession. The coupling between the angular and radial motion of the binary also excites a series of harmonics in the stars' oscillation. In the small eccentricity limit, this coupling mainly gives rise to an additional orbital resonance, with the orbital frequency being one third of the f-mode frequency. For a binary with initial eccentricity $\sim 0.2$ at $50$Hz orbital frequency, the presence of this tidal resonance introduces $\sim 0.5$ phase shift in the gravitational waveform till merger, subject to uncertainties in neutron star equation of state and the distribution of binary component masses. Such phase shift in the late-inspiral stage is likely detectable with third-generation gravitational-wave detectors.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars: Incorporating tidal spin and enhanced radiation from dynamical tides
A new EOB model for BNS/NSBH inspirals adds tidal-spin back-reaction and finite-frequency radiation corrections, yielding waveform phase shifts up to a few radians that previous effective Love number models miss.
-
Analytic Waveforms for Eccentric Gravitational Wave Bursts
A new analytic 'effective fly-by' waveform family for eccentric gravitational wave bursts, validated against numerical and numerical-relativity waveforms.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.