Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian Search for Robust Optima

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.11416 v3 pith:WIT6IO62 submitted 2019-04-25 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords expensivefunctionoptimisationbayesianmethodproblemsprocessregion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many expensive black-box optimisation problems are sensitive to their inputs. In these problems it makes more sense to locate a region of good designs, than a single-possibly fragile-optimal design. Expensive black-box functions can be optimised effectively with Bayesian optimisation, where a Gaussian process is a popular choice as a prior over the expensive function. We propose a method for robust optimisation using Bayesian optimisation to find a region of design space in which the expensive function's performance is relatively insensitive to the inputs whilst retaining a good quality. This is achieved by sampling realisations from a Gaussian process that is modelling the expensive function, and evaluating the improvement for each realisation. The expectation of these improvements can be optimised cheaply with an evolutionary algorithm to determine the next location at which to evaluate the expensive function. We describe an efficient process to locate the optimum expected improvement. We show empirically that evaluating the expensive function at the location in the candidate uncertainty region about which the model is most uncertain, or at random, yield the best convergence in contrast to exploitative schemes. We illustrate our method on six test functions in two, five, and ten dimensions, and demonstrate that it is able to outperform two state-of-the-art approaches from the literature. We also demonstrate our method one two real-world problems in 4 and 8 dimensions, which involve training robot arms to push objects onto targets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CheckMate: LLM-Powered Approximate Intermittent Computing

    cs.DC 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CheckMate automatically applies and tunes approximate computing transformations in batteryless IoT code using LLMs plus Bayesian optimization, reducing power cycles by up to 60% on six benchmarks.

Pith tools