Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep-MAPS: Machine Learning based Mobile Air Pollution Sensing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.12303 v2 pith:XIKYJFPR submitted 2019-04-28 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords mobilesensingdeep-mapspollutionspatial-temporalurbanaccuracyfixed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mobile and ubiquitous sensing of urban air quality has received increased attention as an economically and operationally viable means to survey atmospheric environment with high spatial-temporal resolution. This paper proposes a machine learning based mobile air pollution sensing framework, called Deep-MAPS, and demonstrates its scientific and financial values in the following aspects. (1) Based on a network of fixed and mobile air quality sensors, we perform spatial inference of PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing (3,025 km2, 19 Jun-16 Jul 2018) for a spatial-temporal resolution of 1km-by-1km and 1 hour, with over 85% accuracy. (2) We leverage urban big data to generate insights regarding the potential cause of pollution, which facilitates evidence-based sustainable urban management. (3) To achieve such spatial-temporal coverage and accuracy, Deep-MAPS can save up to 90% hardware investment, compared with ubiquitous sensing that relies primarily on fixed sensors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Air in Your Neighborhood: Fine-Grained AQI Forecasting Using Mobile Sensor Data

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A deep learning pipeline on mobile-sensor data achieves much lower AQI forecast error than classical baselines on Delhi's AirDelhi dataset, though the headline 79% improvement is overstated due to metric confusion.

Pith tools