Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Transfer Learning For Chatter Detection in Turning Using Wavelet Packet Transform and Empirical Mode Decomposition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.01982 v2 pith:DLVVC374 submitted 2019-05-03 eess.SP cs.CEcs.LGstat.ML

classification eess.SPcs.CEcs.LGstat.ML
keywords methodschattercuttingdecompositioneemdlearningmachinetransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing availability of sensor data at machine tools makes automatic chatter detection algorithms a trending topic in metal cutting. Two prominent and advanced methods for feature extraction via signal decomposition are Wavelet Packet Transform (WPT) and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD). We apply these two methods to time series acquired from an acceleration sensor at the tool holder of a lathe. Different turning experiments with varying dynamic behavior of the machine tool structure were performed. We compare the performance of these two methods with Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, Random Forest Classification and Gradient Boosting combined with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE). We also show that the common WPT-based approach of choosing wavelet packets with the highest energy ratios as representative features for chatter does not always result in packets that enclose the chatter frequency, thus reducing the classification accuracy. Further, we test the transfer learning capability of each of these methods by training the classifier on one of the cutting configurations and then testing it on the other cases. It is found that when training and testing on data from the same cutting configuration both methods yield high accuracies reaching in one of the cases as high as 94% and 95%, respectively, for WPT and EEMD. However, our experimental results show that EEMD can outperform WPT in transfer learning applications with accuracy of up to 95%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chatter Detection in Turning Using Machine Learning and Similarity Measures of Time Series via Dynamic Time Warping

    eess.SP 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In three of four turning setups, kNN with DTW distances on raw acceleration signals matched or beat wavelet, EEMD, and topological feature classifiers for chatter detection.

Pith tools