Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deep Learning for Sequential Recommendation: Algorithms, Influential Factors, and Evaluations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.01997 v3 pith:Y4QJLEZ7 submitted 2019-04-30 cs.IR cs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.LG
keywords sequentialrecommendationdl-basedfactorsalgorithmsdeepevaluationsfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the field of sequential recommendation, deep learning (DL)-based methods have received a lot of attention in the past few years and surpassed traditional models such as Markov chain-based and factorization-based ones. However, there is little systematic study on DL-based methods, especially regarding to how to design an effective DL model for sequential recommendation. In this view, this survey focuses on DL-based sequential recommender systems by taking the aforementioned issues into consideration. Specifically,we illustrate the concept of sequential recommendation, propose a categorization of existing algorithms in terms of three types of behavioral sequence, summarize the key factors affecting the performance of DL-based models, and conduct corresponding evaluations to demonstrate the effects of these factors. We conclude this survey by systematically outlining future directions and challenges in this field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards a Unified Paradigm: Integrating Recommendation Systems as a New Language in Large Models

    cs.IR 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RSLLM mixes item ID embeddings from classical recommenders with text titles inside an LLM prompt and uses two-stage contrastive fine-tuning to improve sequential recommendation.

  2. Instruction-Based Fine-tuning of Open-Source LLMs for Predicting Customer Purchase Behaviors

    cs.IR 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Instruction-tuned Mistral 7B achieves modestly higher F1 than CNN/LSTM on next merchant category prediction, but the evaluation lacks significance tests and the weighted F1 is dominated by an 'Other' class.

Pith tools