REVIEW 1 cited by
The End of Runaway: How Gap Opening Limits the Final Masses of Gas Giants
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Gas giants are thought to form by runaway accretion: an instability driven by the self-gravity of growing atmospheres that causes accretion rates to rise super-linearly with planet mass. Why runaway should stop at a Jupiter or any other mass is unknown. We consider the proposal that final masses are controlled by circumstellar disc gaps (cavities) opened by planetary gravitational torques. We develop a fully time-dependent theory of gap formation and couple it self-consistently to planetary growth rates. When gaps first open, planetary torques overwhelm viscous torques, and gas depletes as if it were inviscid. In low-viscosity discs, of the kind motivated by recent observations and theory, gaps stay predominantly in this inviscid phase and planet masses finalize at $M_{\rm final}/M_\star\sim(\Omega t_{\rm disc})^{0.07}(H/a)^{2.73}(G\rho_0/\Omega^2)^{1/3}$, with $M_\star$ the host stellar mass, $\Omega$ the planet's orbital angular velocity, $t_{\rm disc}$ the gas disc's lifetime, $H/a$ its aspect ratio, and $\rho_0$ its unperturbed density. This final mass is independent of the dimensionless viscosity $\alpha$ and applies to large orbital distances, typically beyond $\sim$10 AU, where disc scale heights exceed planet radii. It evaluates to a few Jupiter masses at 10-100 AU, increasing gradually with distance as gaps become harder to open.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Correlation between planet formation rate and gas surface density: an analog of Kennicutt Schmidt law for planet formation
Planet formation rate scales as gas surface density to a power between 4/3 and 2, depending on formation mechanism.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.