Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Are Powerful Graph Neural Nets Necessary? A Dissection on Graph Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.04579 v3 pith:UVH2DQX5 submitted 2019-05-11 cs.LG cs.SIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.SIstat.ML
keywords graphfunctionclassificationfilteringgnnslinearneuralbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Nets (GNNs) have received increasing attentions, partially due to their superior performance in many node and graph classification tasks. However, there is a lack of understanding on what they are learning and how sophisticated the learned graph functions are. In this work, we propose a dissection of GNNs on graph classification into two parts: 1) the graph filtering, where graph-based neighbor aggregations are performed, and 2) the set function, where a set of hidden node features are composed for prediction. To study the importance of both parts, we propose to linearize them separately. We first linearize the graph filtering function, resulting Graph Feature Network (GFN), which is a simple lightweight neural net defined on a \textit{set} of graph augmented features. Further linearization of GFN's set function results in Graph Linear Network (GLN), which is a linear function. Empirically we perform evaluations on common graph classification benchmarks. To our surprise, we find that, despite the simplification, GFN could match or exceed the best accuracies produced by recently proposed GNNs (with a fraction of computation cost), while GLN underperforms significantly. Our results demonstrate the importance of non-linear set function, and suggest that linear graph filtering with non-linear set function is an efficient and powerful scheme for modeling existing graph classification benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 52 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Bridging the Gap Between Hyperdimensional Computing and Kernel Methods via the Nystr\"om Method

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    NysHD uses the Nyström method to map any positive-definite kernel into a low-precision hyperdimensional encoding, preserving normalized kernel values and improving HDC accuracy on graph and string benchmarks.

  2. No Metric to Rule Them All: Toward Principled Evaluations of Graph-Learning Datasets

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RINGS evaluates graph-learning datasets through mode perturbations, using performance separability and mode complementarity to classify 13 benchmarks into keep, realign, or deprecate.

  3. Graph Structure Refinement with Energy-based Contrastive Learning

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new framework, ECL-GSR, uses energy-based contrastive learning to refine noisy graph structure and reports state-of-the-art node classification accuracy on eight benchmarks.

Pith tools