Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Forecasting Wireless Demand with Extreme Values using Feature Embedding in Gaussian Processes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.06744 v2 pith:VPRC2R5Z submitted 2019-05-15 eess.SP cs.LGstat.ML

classification eess.SPcs.LGstat.ML
keywords extremeforecastreductiondemandforecastingpredictiontrafficvalues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Wireless traffic prediction is a fundamental enabler to proactive network optimisation in beyond 5G. Forecasting extreme demand spikes and troughs due to traffic mobility is essential to avoiding outages and improving energy efficiency. Current state-of-the-art deep learning forecasting methods predominantly focus on overall forecast performance and do not offer probabilistic uncertainty quantification (UQ). Whilst Gaussian Process (GP) models have UQ capability, it is not able to predict extreme values very well. Here, we design a feature embedding (FE) kernel for a GP model to forecast traffic demand with extreme values. Using real 4G base station data, we compare our FE-GP performance against both conventional naive GPs, ARIMA models, as well as demonstrate the UQ output. For short-term extreme value prediction, we demonstrated a 32\% reduction vs. S-ARIMA and 17\% reduction vs. Naive-GP. For long-term average value prediction, we demonstrated a 21\% reduction vs. S-ARIMA and 12\% reduction vs. Naive-GP. The FE kernel also enabled us to create a flexible trade-off between overall forecast accuracy against peak-trough accuracy. The advantage over neural network (e.g. CNN, LSTM) is that the probabilistic forecast uncertainty can inform us of the risk of predictions, as well as the full posterior distribution of the forecast.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools