Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measuring Directed Triadic Closure with Closure Coefficients

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.10683 v2 pith:TZS4Q4D6 submitted 2019-05-25 cs.SI physics.soc-ph

Measuring Directed Triadic Closure with Closure Coefficients

classification cs.SI physics.soc-ph
keywords closurecoefficientsdirectedmeasuresgraphstriadiccentercenter-focused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work studying triadic closure in undirected graphs has drawn attention to the distinction between measures that focus on the "center" node of a wedge (i.e., length-2 path) vs. measures that focus on the "initiator," a distinction with considerable consequences. Existing measures in directed graphs, meanwhile, have all been center-focused. In this work, we propose a family of eight directed closure coefficients that measure the frequency of triadic closure in directed graphs from the perspective of the node initiating closure. The eight coefficients correspond to different labelled wedges, where the initiator and center nodes are labelled, and we observe dramatic empirical variation in these coefficients on real-world networks, even in cases when the induced directed triangles are isomorphic. To understand this phenomenon, we examine the theoretical behavior of our closure coefficients under a directed configuration model. Our analysis illustrates an underlying connection between the closure coefficients and moments of the joint in- and out-degree distributions of the network, offering an explanation of the observed asymmetries. We also use our directed closure coefficients as predictors in two machine learning tasks. We find interpretable models with AUC scores above 0.92 in class-balanced binary prediction, substantially outperforming models that use traditional center-focused measures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.