Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Large-S limit of the large-N theory for the triangular antiferromagnet

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.10689 v3 pith:H2S4Q3RI submitted 2019-05-25 cond-mat.str-el

Large-S limit of the large-N theory for the triangular antiferromagnet

classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords large-spinlimitsaddle-pointtheoryantiferromagnetcorrectionsexactly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large-$S$ and large-$N$ theories (spin value $S$ and spinor component number $N$) are complementary, and sometimes conflicting, approaches to quantum magnetism. While large-$S$ spin-wave theory captures the correct semiclassical behavior, large-$N$ theories, on the other hand, emphasize the quantumness of spin fluctuations. In order to evaluate the possibility of the non-trivial recovery of the semiclassical magnetic excitations within a large-$N$ approach, we compute the large-$S$ limit of the dynamic spin structure of the triangular lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet within a Schwinger boson spin representation. We demonstrate that, only after the incorporation of Gaussian ($1/N$) corrections to the saddle-point ($N=\infty$) approximation, we are able to exactly reproduce the linear spin wave theory results in the large-$S$ limit. The key observation is that the effect of $1/N$ corrections is to cancel out exactly the main contribution of the saddle-point solution; while the collective modes (magnons) consist of two spinon bound states arising from the poles of the RPA propagator. This result implies that it is essential to consider the interaction of the spinons with the emergent gauge fields and that the magnon dispersion relation should not be identified with that of the saddle-point spinons.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.