REVIEW 3 cited by
AI-GAs: AI-generating algorithms, an alternate paradigm for producing general artificial intelligence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Perhaps the most ambitious scientific quest in human history is the creation of general artificial intelligence, which roughly means AI that is as smart or smarter than humans. The dominant approach in the machine learning community is to attempt to discover each of the pieces required for intelligence, with the implicit assumption that some future group will complete the Herculean task of figuring out how to combine all of those pieces into a complex thinking machine. I call this the "manual AI approach". This paper describes another exciting path that ultimately may be more successful at producing general AI. It is based on the clear trend in machine learning that hand-designed solutions eventually are replaced by more effective, learned solutions. The idea is to create an AI-generating algorithm (AI-GA), which automatically learns how to produce general AI. Three Pillars are essential for the approach: (1) meta-learning architectures, (2) meta-learning the learning algorithms themselves, and (3) generating effective learning environments. I argue that either approach could produce general AI first, and both are scientifically worthwhile irrespective of which is the fastest path. Because both are promising, yet the ML community is currently committed to the manual approach, I argue that our community should increase its research investment in the AI-GA approach. To encourage such research, I describe promising work in each of the Three Pillars. I also discuss AI-GA-specific safety and ethical considerations. Because it it may be the fastest path to general AI and because it is inherently scientifically interesting to understand the conditions in which a simple algorithm can produce general AI (as happened on Earth where Darwinian evolution produced human intelligence), I argue that the pursuit of AI-GAs should be considered a new grand challenge of computer science research.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond Fixed Representations: The Vocabulary and Verifier Gaps in Open-Ended AI
Open-ended AI is blocked by a vocabulary gap (inventing reusable primitives) and a verifier gap (valuing them when payoff is delayed), unified under cognitive discrepancy reduction and a four-level autonomy ladder.
-
Evolutionary Developmental Biology Can Serve as the Conceptual Foundation for a New Design Paradigm in Artificial Intelligence
The paper proposes regulatory connections, weak linkage, and component-level variation-selection, drawn from evo-devo, as the unifying conceptual foundation for a new AI design paradigm.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Ecosystem: Evolutionary Developments, Challenges, and Future Directions
AIIE is framed as an AI-dominated innovation ecosystem whose participant mix, coopetition, and goals shift by lifecycle stage, illustrated with Owkin and four open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.