Pith. sign in

REVIEW

DSReg: Using Distant Supervision as a Regularizer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.11658 v3 pith:DWJFRI6H submitted 2019-05-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords exampleshard-negativepositivedistantregularizersupervisiondifferentdistinguishing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we aim at tackling a general issue in NLP tasks where some of the negative examples are highly similar to the positive examples, i.e., hard-negative examples. We propose the distant supervision as a regularizer (DSReg) approach to tackle this issue. The original task is converted to a multi-task learning problem, in which distant supervision is used to retrieve hard-negative examples. The obtained hard-negative examples are then used as a regularizer. The original target objective of distinguishing positive examples from negative examples is jointly optimized with the auxiliary task objective of distinguishing softened positive (i.e., hard-negative examples plus positive examples) from easy-negative examples. In the neural context, this can be done by outputting the same representation from the last neural layer to different $softmax$ functions. Using this strategy, we can improve the performance of baseline models in a range of different NLP tasks, including text classification, sequence labeling and reading comprehension.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools