Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SEMA: an Extended Semantic Evaluation Metric for AMR

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.12069 v1 pith:XP5CD7JE submitted 2019-05-28 cs.CL

Rafael T. Anchieta , Marco A. S. Cabezudo , Thiago A. S. Pardo This is my paper
classification cs.CL
keywords metricsmatchdrawbacksevaluationparserssemanticextendedgraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) is a recently designed semantic representation language intended to capture the meaning of a sentence, which may be represented as a single-rooted directed acyclic graph with labeled nodes and edges. The automatic evaluation of this structure plays an important role in the development of better systems, as well as for semantic annotation. Despite there is one available metric, smatch, it has some drawbacks. For instance, smatch creates a self-relation on the root of the graph, has weights for different error types, and does not take into account the dependence of the elements in the AMR structure. With these drawbacks, smatch masks several problems of the AMR parsers and distorts the evaluation of the AMRs. In view of this, in this paper, we introduce an extended metric to evaluate AMR parsers, which deals with the drawbacks of the smatch metric. Finally, we compare both metrics, using four well-known AMR parsers, and we argue that our metric is more refined, robust, fairer, and faster than smatch.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluation of Finetuned LLMs in AMR Parsing

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Simple finetuning of LLaMA 3.2 reaches SMATCH F1 0.804 on the AMR 3.0 test set, matching the APT+Silver parser and coming within 0.05 of the Graphene state of the art.

Pith tools