REVIEW 2 cited by
Certifiably Robust Interpretation in Deep Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning interpretation is essential to explain the reasoning behind model predictions. Understanding the robustness of interpretation methods is important especially in sensitive domains such as medical applications since interpretation results are often used in downstream tasks. Although gradient-based saliency maps are popular methods for deep learning interpretation, recent works show that they can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. In this paper, we address this problem and provide a certifiable defense method for deep learning interpretation. We show that a sparsified version of the popular SmoothGrad method, which computes the average saliency maps over random perturbations of the input, is certifiably robust against adversarial perturbations. We obtain this result by extending recent bounds for certifiably robust smooth classifiers to the interpretation setting. Experiments on ImageNet samples validate our theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Provably Robust Explainable Graph Neural Networks against Graph Perturbation Attacks
XGNNCert certifies that a GNN explanation keeps at least lambda edges under any graph perturbation of bounded size, using majority voting over hash-partitioned hybrid subgraphs.
-
A Super-pixel-based Approach to the Stable Interpretation of Neural Networks
Averaging saliency values within super-pixel groups reduces the variance and improves the stability and generalizability of gradient-based interpretation maps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.