REVIEW 2 cited by
High Dimensional Classification via Regularized and Unregularized Empirical Risk Minimization: Precise Error and Optimal Loss
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
This article provides, through theoretical analysis, an in-depth understanding of the classification performance of the empirical risk minimization framework, in both ridge-regularized and unregularized cases, when high dimensional data are considered. Focusing on the fundamental problem of separating a two-class Gaussian mixture, the proposed analysis allows for a precise prediction of the classification error for a set of numerous data vectors $\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb R^p$ of sufficiently large dimension $p$. This precise error depends on the loss function, the number of training samples, and the statistics of the mixture data model. It is shown to hold beyond Gaussian distribution under some additional non-sparsity condition of the data statistics. Building upon this quantitative error analysis, we identify the simple square loss as the optimal choice for high dimensional classification in both ridge-regularized and unregularized cases, regardless of the number of training samples.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Variational Bounds for Perceptron Learning from Structured Data
A variational potential gives both a lower and an upper bound on the quenched pressure of a perceptron, with matching supported numerically for logistic-type losses.
-
Analysis of High-dimensional Gaussian Labeled-unlabeled Mixture Model via Message-passing Algorithm
For two-class Gaussian mixtures in high dimensions, optimally regularized maximum likelihood nearly matches Bayes-optimal performance in estimation and prediction error when unlabeled data are abundant.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.