Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Confidence Intervals for Selected Parameters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.00505 v1 pith:POSRNJBM submitted 2019-06-02 stat.ME math.STstat.MLstat.TH

classification stat.MEmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords intervalsparametersconfidenceprobabilityselectedwhencoverageerror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Practical or scientific considerations often lead to selecting a subset of parameters as ``important.'' Inferences about those parameters often are based on the same data used to select them in the first place. That can make the reported uncertainties deceptively optimistic: confidence intervals that ignore selection generally have less than their nominal coverage probability. Controlling the probability that one or more intervals for selected parameters do not cover---the ``simultaneous over the selected'' (SoS) error rate---is crucial in many scientific problems. Intervals that control the SoS error rate can be constructed in ways that take advantage of knowledge of the selection rule. We construct SoS-controlling confidence intervals for parameters deemed the most ``important'' $k$ of $m$ shift parameters because they are estimated (by independent estimators) to be the largest. The new intervals improve substantially over \v{S}id\'{a}k intervals when $k$ is small compared to $m$, and approach the standard Bonferroni-corrected intervals when $k \approx m$. Standard, unadjusted confidence intervals for location parameters have the correct coverage probability for $k=1$, $m=2$ if, when the true parameters are zero, the estimators are exchangeable and symmetric.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Flexible Defense Against the Winner's Curse

    stat.ML 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new confidence-interval method, the zoom correction, provides valid post-selection inference on the winner under arbitrary dependence and without tuning parameters.

  2. Flexible Inference for Winners with Conditional Validity

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A data-adaptive exponential randomization scheme yields conditionally valid confidence intervals for top-k winners, with selection quality close to standard top-k and shorter intervals than polyhedral methods.

Pith tools