REVIEW 2 cited by
Probing high-energy interactions of atmospheric and astrophysical neutrinos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Astrophysical and atmospheric neutrinos are important probes of the powerful accelerators that produce cosmic-rays with EeV energies. Understanding these accelerators is a key goal of neutrino observatories, along with searches for neutrinos from supernovae, from dark matter annihilation, and other astrophysics topics. Here, we discuss how neutrino observatories like IceCube and future facilities like KM3NeT and IceCube-Gen2 can study the properties of high-energy (above 1 TeV) neutrino interactions. This is far higher than is accessible at man-made accelerators, where the highest energy neutrino beam reached only 500 GeV. In contrast, neutrino observatories have observed events with energies above 5 PeV - 10,000 times higher in energy - and future large observatories may probe neutrinos with energies up to $10^{20}$ eV. These data have implications for both Standard Model measurements, such as of low Bjorken$-x$ parton distributions and gluon shadowing, and also for searches for beyond Standard Model physics. This chapter will review the existing techniques and results, and discuss future prospects.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On the Blueprint of Active Galaxies Producing Neutrinos
Neutrinos from active galaxies are produced in compact X-ray-bright coronae within about ten Schwarzschild radii of the black hole, and such sources may supply the diffuse neutrino flux.
-
Measurement of the multi-TeV neutrino cross section with IceCube using Earth absorption
IceCube measured the multi-TeV neutrino-nucleon cross section as 1.30 times the Standard Model prediction, consistent with it, and plans a more precise per-energy measurement with eight years of data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.