Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Data-to-text Generation with Entity Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.03221 v1 pith:WNWZCQLS submitted 2019-06-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords data-to-textgenerationentitymodelneuralrepresentationsapplicationapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent approaches to data-to-text generation have shown great promise thanks to the use of large-scale datasets and the application of neural network architectures which are trained end-to-end. These models rely on representation learning to select content appropriately, structure it coherently, and verbalize it grammatically, treating entities as nothing more than vocabulary tokens. In this work we propose an entity-centric neural architecture for data-to-text generation. Our model creates entity-specific representations which are dynamically updated. Text is generated conditioned on the data input and entity memory representations using hierarchical attention at each time step. We present experiments on the RotoWire benchmark and a (five times larger) new dataset on the baseball domain which we create. Our results show that the proposed model outperforms competitive baselines in automatic and human evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VisEditBench: Can Vision-Language Models Edit Visualization Code from Multimodal Feedback?

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 1,395 human-annotated visualization code-editing tasks shows that even the best vision-language model (Claude-4.6-Sonnet) only passes 74.46% of edits, while render-grounded iterative refinement impr...

  2. CoPERLex: Content Planning with Event-based Representations for Legal Case Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An event-based planning pipeline with content selection improves faithfulness and coherence in legal case summarization across four datasets.

Pith tools