Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Characteristic Power Series of Graph Limits

Combinatorics · Submitted 13 Jun 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this note, we show how to obtain a "characteristic power series" of graphons -- infinite limits of dense graphs -- as the limit of normalized reciprocal characteristic polynomials.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1906.05778 (version 4)
Pith ID6UNKXAGK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJoshua N. Cooper. "Characteristic Power Series of Graph Limits." arXiv:1906.05778 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/6UNKXAGK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,979 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.88 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.23 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this note, we show how to obtain a "characteristic power series" of graphons -- infinite limits of dense graphs -- as the limit of normalized reciprocal characteristic polynomials. This leads to a new characterization of graph quasi-randomness and another perspective on spectral theory for graphons, a complete description of the function in terms of the spectrum of the graphon as a self-adjoint kernel operator. Interestingly, while we apply a standard regularization to classical determinants, it is unclear how necessary this is.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this note, we show how to obtain a "characteristic power series" of graphons -- infinite limits of dense graphs -- as the limit of normalized reciprocal characteristic polynomials. contribution 0.97 0.94 0.82 asserted 1.00
s1 This leads to a new characterization of graph quasi-randomness and another perspective on spectral theory for graphons, a complete description of the function in terms of the spectrum of the graphon as a self-adjoint kernel operator. result 0.47 0.87 0.35 asserted 1.00
s2 Interestingly, while we apply a standard regularization to classical determinants, it is unclear how necessary this is. limitation 0.87 0.64 0.03 unclear 0.43

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this note, we show how to obtain a "characteristic power series" of graphons -- infinite limits of dense graphs -- as the limit of normalized reciprocal characteristic polynomials. This leads to a new characterization of graph quasi-randomness and another perspective on spectral theory for graphons, a complete description of the function in terms of the spectrum of the graphon as a self-adjoint kernel operator. Interestingly, while we apply a standard regularization to classical determinants, it is unclear how necessary this is.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.