REVIEW 1 cited by
Continuous variable B92 quantum key distribution protocol using single photon added and subtracted coherent states
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, a continuous variable B92 quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol is proposed using single photon added and subtracted coherent states, which are prepared by adding and subsequently subtracting a single photon on a coherent state. It is established that in contrast to the traditional discrete variable B92 protocol, this protocol for QKD is intrinsically robust against the unambiguous state discrimination attack, which circumvents the requirement for any uninformative states or entanglement used in corresponding discrete variable case as a remedy for this attack. Further, it is shown that the proposed protocol is intrinsically robust against the eavesdropping strategies exploiting classical communication during basis reconciliation, such as beam splitter attack. Security against some individual attacks, key rate, and bit-error rate estimation for the proposed scheme are also provided. Specifically, the proposed scheme ensures very small bit-error rate due to properties of the states used. Thus, the proposed scheme is shown to be preferable over the corresponding discrete variable B92 protocol as well as some similar continuous variable quantum key distribution schemes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Impact of photon addition and subtraction on nonclassical and phase properties of a displaced Fock state
A systematic analysis shows that photon addition generally improves nonclassicality of a photon-added-then-subtracted displaced Fock state, with higher-order criteria detecting effects that lower-order ones miss.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.