pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.08266 · v1 · pith:VEFANXZRnew · submitted 2019-06-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

An X-ray reverberation mass measurement of Cygnus X-1

Guglielmo Mastroserio , Adam Ingram , Michiel van der Klis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 20:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords X-ray reverberationblack hole mass measurementCygnus X-1accretion disk reflectiontiming analysisrelativistic effectsstellar-mass black holeionization profile
0
0 comments X

The pith

X-ray reverberation lags yield a mass for the Cygnus X-1 black hole consistent with dynamical measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes the first mass measurement of a stellar-mass black hole using X-ray reverberation. The method exploits time delays between direct X-rays and those reflected from the accretion disk to set the physical scale of the gravitational radius. A relativistic model is used to jointly fit the average spectrum and the real and imaginary parts of the cross-spectrum across a range of Fourier frequencies in RXTE data from Cygnus X-1. Introducing a self-consistent radial ionization profile improves the fit but requires capping the peak ionization to keep the disk density physically plausible, producing a mass aligned with prior dynamical results.

Core claim

We present the first X-ray reverberation mass measurement of a stellar-mass black hole. Accreting stellar-mass and supermassive black holes display characteristic spectral features resulting from reprocessing of hard X-rays by the accretion disc, such as an Fe Kα line and a Compton hump. Measuring the reverberation lag resulting from the difference in path length between direct and reflected emission calibrates the absolute length of the gravitational radius. We use a relativistic model able to reproduce the behaviour of the lags as a function of energy for a wide range of variability timescales, addressing both the reverberation lags on short timescales and the intrinsic hard lags on longer

What carries the argument

Relativistic reverberation model that reproduces energy-dependent lags across variability timescales by jointly fitting the spectrum and real/imaginary cross-spectrum components.

If this is right

  • Mass of Cygnus X-1 can be constrained through X-ray timing data alone rather than dynamical orbits.
  • Joint spectral-timing fits tighten constraints on black hole spin, inclination, and disk geometry simultaneously.
  • Self-consistent radial ionization profiles improve reflection model fits to both spectrum and lags.
  • Imposing the ionization cap produces a mass value aligned with the existing dynamical measurement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reverberation approach could supply independent masses for other X-ray binaries where dynamical data are sparse.
  • Higher signal-to-noise data from newer observatories might allow the ionization limit to be relaxed or removed.
  • The technique links stellar-mass and supermassive black hole studies through a common absolute length calibration.
  • Discrepancies between mass methods in other sources could be tested by applying the same cross-spectrum fitting.

Load-bearing premise

The model requires an imposed upper limit on the peak of the radial ionization profile to produce a plausible accretion disk density.

What would settle it

An independent measurement or calculation showing that the disk density without the imposed ionization limit is physically acceptable while still fitting the data would remove the need for the adjustment and alter the derived mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.08266 by Adam Ingram, Guglielmo Mastroserio, Michiel van der Klis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Unfolded spectrum (upper panel) and residuals (lower panel) of the time averaged energy spectrum fit. The three colours represent different models explained in the text (the data points are unfolded around the best fitting model C). 0.1% systematics have been added to the spectrum. A fit with no systematics added produces the same parameter values and residual shape. trinsic model TBabs. We assume the abun… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Chi-squared curves of black hole mass calculated for different assumptions on the degree of ionisation of the disc as a function of radius. The shaded region represents the 3σ confidence interval of the existing dynamical mass measurement. All three fits are also similar in terms of residual systematics ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ∆χ 2 2D contour plot between the black hole mass and the peak ionisation parameter. The ionisation profile is the one used in Model 3. The colour scale indicates the relative increase of χ 2 compared with the best fit of Model 3. The 4 black lines are the sigma contours corresponding to 2 degrees of freedom (∆χ 2 = 2.3, 6.18, 11.83 and 19.33, corresponding to 1, 2, 3 and 4 σ). column density has a very low… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top panels show the fit of real (a) and imaginary (b) part of the Cygnus X-1 complex covariance spectrum with Model 3. The fit also includes the time-averaged energy spectrum which is not shown in this plot. The dots are the data and the lines in the top panels are the model which has a much higher energy resolution than the data for clarity. The bottom panels show the data minus the folded model (command … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Residuals (data minus the folded model) of the time￾average energy spectrum of Model 3 (black stars), Model 3a (blue squares) and Model 3b (red diamonds). Here the residual plot shows only the time-averaged energy spectrum contribution for clarity, however this a joint fit with the complex covariance. fied to include the non-linear effects resulting from fluctua￾tions in the slope of the irradiating spectr… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Residuals (data minus the folded model in units of normalised counts per second per keV) of the complex covariance spectra (real and imaginary part) for Model 3a. The fit also includes the time-average energy spectrum which is not shown in this plot. 5.0 10.0 20.0 Energy (keV) 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 lag (sec) (a) 5.0 10.0 20.0 Energy (keV) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 A m plit u d e ( k e… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Lags (a) and variability amplitude (b) as a function of energy for different Fourier frequency ranges. The dots are the data and the lines are calculated from the best fitting parameters of Model 3. The data points for the lowest three frequency ranges are not plotted in the lag energy spectrum because their very large error bars. Only the model lines are plotted for these frequency ranges. creates structu… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Best fit parameters which control the spectral power￾law slope variability, as function of Fourier frequency for Model 3. The φA line and the γ line (black solid and blue dashed) refer to the left y-axis. The φB line (red dotted) refers to the right yaxis. Every group of three parameters in the same frequency range has been used to fit the complex covariance. tribute to the iron line for the highest peak i… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first X-ray reverberation mass measurement of a stellar-mass black hole. Accreting stellar-mass and supermassive black holes display characteristic spectral features resulting from reprocessing of hard X-rays by the accretion disc, such as an Fe K$\alpha$ line and a Compton hump. This emission probes of the innermost region of the accretion disc through general relativistic distortions to the line profile. However, these spectral distortions are insensitive to black hole mass, since they depend on disc geometry in units of gravitational radii. Measuring the reverberation lag resulting from the difference in path length between direct and reflected emission calibrates the absolute length of the gravitational radius. We use a relativistic model able to reproduce the behaviour of the lags as a function of energy for a wide range of variability timescales, addressing both the reverberation lags on short timescales and the intrinsic hard lags on longer timescales. We jointly fit the time-averaged spectrum and the real and imaginary parts of the cross-spectrum as a function of energy for a range of Fourier frequencies to Rossi X-ray Timing Exporer data from the X-ray binary Cygnus X-1. We also show that introducing a self-consistently calculated radial ionisation profile in the disc improves the fit, but requires us to impose an upper limit on ionisation profile peak to allow a plausible value of the accretion disc density. This limit leads to a mass value more consistent with the existing dynamical measurement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to present the first X-ray reverberation mass measurement of the stellar-mass black hole in Cygnus X-1. It jointly fits the time-averaged spectrum and the real/imaginary parts of the cross-spectrum across Fourier frequencies to RXTE data using a relativistic model that incorporates both reverberation lags on short timescales and intrinsic hard lags on longer timescales. A self-consistently calculated radial ionization profile is shown to improve the fit, but an explicit upper limit must be imposed on the ionization profile peak to obtain a physically plausible accretion-disk density; this limit produces a mass value consistent with the existing dynamical measurement.

Significance. If the result holds, the work would constitute a novel extension of reverberation mapping to stellar-mass black holes, providing an independent mass calibration that converts the gravitational-radius scale into physical units via measured time lags. The joint modeling of spectrum and cross-spectrum is a methodological strength that addresses both spectral and timing information self-consistently. The dependence on an externally imposed ionization constraint, however, reduces the independence of the mass determination from prior dynamical results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported mass is obtained only after an ad-hoc upper limit is placed on the peak of the radial ionization profile to enforce a plausible disk density. The text states that this limit is what yields a mass consistent with the dynamical measurement, indicating that the constraint is load-bearing for the central result rather than the lag data and transfer function alone.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No quantitative justification is given for the specific value chosen for the ionization upper limit, nor are sensitivity tests reported showing how the fitted mass changes when the limit is varied or removed. This leaves open whether the mass is robustly determined by the data or is tuned by the external constraint.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We address the major comments point-by-point below and indicate where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported mass is obtained only after an ad-hoc upper limit is placed on the peak of the radial ionization profile to enforce a plausible disk density. The text states that this limit is what yields a mass consistent with the dynamical measurement, indicating that the constraint is load-bearing for the central result rather than the lag data and transfer function alone.

    Authors: We agree that the upper limit on the ionization peak is required to obtain a physically plausible accretion-disk density; unconstrained fits produce densities far below theoretical expectations for X-ray binary disks. The reverberation lags and cross-spectrum data do constrain the radial extent of the reflector in gravitational radii and thereby the mass scale once the geometry is fixed, but the ionization constraint is necessary to exclude unphysical solutions. We will revise the abstract and add clarifying text in the discussion section to better separate the data-driven constraints from the physical prior on density. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No quantitative justification is given for the specific value chosen for the ionization upper limit, nor are sensitivity tests reported showing how the fitted mass changes when the limit is varied or removed. This leaves open whether the mass is robustly determined by the data or is tuned by the external constraint.

    Authors: The specific upper-limit value was chosen to enforce a minimum inner-disk density of order 10^17 cm^{-3}, consistent with expectations from standard thin-disk theory and prior X-ray binary observations. We acknowledge that the current manuscript lacks explicit sensitivity tests. We will add these tests (varying or removing the limit) to a revised version, reporting the resulting range of mass values to demonstrate robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: mass obtained via direct fit to lag data under explicit constraint

full rationale

The paper performs a joint fit of a relativistic reverberation model to the time-averaged spectrum and the real/imaginary parts of the cross-spectrum, treating black hole mass as a free scaling parameter that sets the absolute length scale of the gravitational radius via the observed lags. The radial ionization profile is computed self-consistently within the model, but an external upper bound is imposed on its peak value solely to enforce a physically plausible disk density; this bound is stated as an input choice that yields a mass consistent with the independent dynamical value. No step equates the fitted mass to its own inputs by construction, renames a known result, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose content reduces to the present work. The derivation chain therefore remains a standard parameter estimation under stated assumptions rather than a closed loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement rests on the accuracy of the relativistic reverberation model for lags across timescales and on the physical justification for the imposed ionization upper limit.

free parameters (2)
  • black hole mass
    The parameter that scales the gravitational radius to physical units and is determined from the lag amplitude.
  • ionization profile peak
    Upper limit imposed by hand to keep disk density plausible; unconstrained value leads to unphysical density.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The relativistic model correctly reproduces the energy-dependent lags for both reverberation and intrinsic hard lags across the observed Fourier frequency range.
    Invoked to justify joint fitting of spectrum and cross-spectrum.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5796 in / 1347 out tokens · 29395 ms · 2026-05-25T20:02:56.626298+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Ar \'e valo P., Uttley P., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09989.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.367..801A 367, 801

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09989.x 2006

  4. [4]

    A., 1996, in Jacoby G

    Arnaud K. A., 1996, in Jacoby G. H., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. p. 17

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Analysis of NuSTAR and Suzaku observations of Cyg X-1 in the hard state: evidence for a truncated disc geometry

    Basak R., Zdziarski A. A., Parker M., Islam N., 2017, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170506638B ( @eprint arXiv 1705.06638 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-013-0030-6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014SSRv..183..223C 183, 223

    Casares J., Jonker P. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-013-0030-6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014SSRv..183..223C 183, 223

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-013-0030-6 2014

  7. [7]

    J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2964 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3965C 465, 3965

    Chainakun P., Young A. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2964 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3965C 465, 3965

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2964 2017

  8. [8]

    J., Kara E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1105 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.3076C 460, 3076

    Chainakun P., Young A. J., Kara E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1105 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.3076C 460, 3076

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1105 2016

  9. [9]

    W., Falanga M., Fukumura K., Reynolds C

    Dauser T., Garcia J., Wilms J., B \"o ck M., Brenneman L. W., Falanga M., Fukumura K., Reynolds C. S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts710 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.1694D 430, 1694

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts710 2013

  10. [10]

    De Marco B., Ponti G., Mu \ n oz-Darias T., Nandra K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/50 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...814...50D 814, 50

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/50 2015

  11. [11]

    E., Dov c iak M., McHardy I

    Emmanoulopoulos D., Papadakis I. E., Dov c iak M., McHardy I. M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu249 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.3931E 439, 3931

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu249 2014

  12. [12]

    C., Ross R

    Fabian A. C., Ross R. R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-010-9699-y , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010SSRv..157..167F 157, 167

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9699-y 2010

  13. [13]

    C., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature08007 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Natur.459..540F 459, 540

    Fabian A. C., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature08007 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Natur.459..540F 459, 540

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08007 2009

  14. [14]

    and Shibahashi , H

    Fabian A. C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21185.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424..217F 424, 217

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21185.x 2012

  15. [15]

    C., Lohfink A., Kara E., Parker M

    Fabian A. C., Lohfink A., Kara E., Parker M. L., Vasudevan R., Reynolds C. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1218 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.4375F 451, 4375

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1218 2015

  16. [16]

    Gandhi P., Rao A., Johnson M. A. C., Paice J. A., Maccarone T. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz438 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.2642G 485, 2642

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz438 2019

  17. [17]

    R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/695 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...718..695G 718, 695

    Garc \' a J., Kallman T. R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/695 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...718..695G 718, 695

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/2/695 2010

  18. [18]

    S., Kallman T

    Garc \' a J., Dauser T., Reynolds C. S., Kallman T. R., McClintock J. E., Wilms J., Eikmann W., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/146 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768..146G 768, 146

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/2/146 2013

  19. [19]

    Garc \' a J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/76 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782...76G 782, 76

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/76 2014

  20. [20]

    A., Steiner J

    Garc \' a J. A., Steiner J. F., McClintock J. E., Remillard R. A., Grinberg V., Dauser T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/84 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...84G 813, 84

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/2/84 2015

  21. [21]

    A., Fabian A

    Garc \' a J. A., Fabian A. C., Kallman T. R., Dauser T., Parker M. L., McClintock J. E., Steiner J. F., Wilms J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1696 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462..751G 462, 751

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1696 2016

  22. [22]

    B., 1992, @doi [Statistical Science] 10.1214/ss/1177011136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992StaSc...7..457G 7, 457

    Gelman A., Rubin D. B., 1992, @doi [Statistical Science] 10.1214/ss/1177011136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992StaSc...7..457G 7, 457

    work page doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 1992

  23. [23]

    M., Fabian A

    George I. M., Fabian A. C., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/249.2.352 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991MNRAS.249..352G 249, 352

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/249.2.352 1991

  24. [24]

    University Press, pp 169--193

    Geweke J., 1992, in IN BAYESIAN STATISTICS. University Press, pp 169--193

    work page 1992

  25. [25]

    Gilfanov M., Churazov E., Revnivtsev M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03686.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.316..923G 316, 923

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03686.x 2000

  26. [26]

    Grinberg V., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322969 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322969 2014

  27. [27]

    Ingram A., van der Klis M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1107 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1476I 434, 1476

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1107 2013

  28. [28]

    C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00693.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.397L.101I 397, L101

    Ingram A., Done C., Fragile P. C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00693.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.397L.101I 397, L101

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00693.x 2009

  29. [29]

    C., Wang J., Walton D

    Jiang J., Fabian A. C., Wang J., Walton D. J., Garc \' a J. A., Parker M. L., Steiner J. F., Tomsick J. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz095 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.1972J 484, 1972

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz095 2019

  30. [30]

    S., Dom c ek V., Svoboda J., Dov c iak M., Matt G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz408 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485..239K 485, 239

    Kammoun E. S., Dom c ek V., Svoboda J., Dov c iak M., Matt G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz408 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485..239K 485, 239

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz408 2019

  31. [31]

    N., Fabian A

    Kara E., Alston W. N., Fabian A. C., Cackett E. M., Uttley P., Reynolds C. S., Zoghbi A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1695 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462..511K 462, 511

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1695 2016

  32. [32]

    Kara E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0803-x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.565..198K 565, 198

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0803-x 2019

  33. [33]

    Kotov O., Churazov E., Gilfanov M., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04769.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.327..799K 327, 799

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04769.x 2001

  34. [34]

    Luminet J.-P., 1979, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A

    work page 1979

  35. [35]

    E., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/292.3.679 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.292..679L 292, 679

    Lyubarskii Y. E., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/292.3.679 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.292..679L 292, 679

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/292.3.679 1997

  36. [36]

    D., Done C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2359 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.2084M 473, 2084

    Mahmoud R. D., Done C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2359 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.2084M 473, 2084

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2359 2018

  37. [37]

    A., Wilms J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497628 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...635.1203M 635, 1203

    Markoff S., Nowak M. A., Wilms J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497628 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...635.1203M 635, 1203

    work page doi:10.1086/497628 2005

  38. [38]

    Martocchia A., Karas V., Matt G., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03205.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.312..817M 312, 817

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03205.x 2000

  39. [39]

    Mastroserio G., Ingram A., van der Klis M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty075 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.4027M 475, 4027

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty075 2018

  40. [40]

    M., Papadakis I

    McHardy I. M., Papadakis I. E., Uttley P., Page M. J., Mason K. O., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07376.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.348..783M 348, 783

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07376.x 2004

  41. [41]

    J., Reeves J

    Miller L., Turner T. J., Reeves J. N., Braito V., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17261.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408.1928M 408, 1928

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17261.x 2010

  42. [42]

    F., Rodrigues I., 2003, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1083451 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Sci...300.1119M 300, 1119

    Mirabel I. F., Rodrigues I., 2003, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1083451 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Sci...300.1119M 300, 1119

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1083451 2003

  43. [43]

    Miyamoto S., Kitamoto S., Mitsuda K., Dotani T., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1038/336450a0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988Natur.336..450M 336, 450

    work page doi:10.1038/336450a0 1988

  44. [44]

    Mizumoto M., Done C., Hagino K., Ebisawa K., Tsujimoto M., Odaka H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1114 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478..971M 478, 971

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1114 2018

  45. [45]

    A., Szanecki M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821L...1N 821, L1

    Nied \'z wiecki A., Zdziarski A. A., Szanecki M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821L...1N 821, L1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/l1 2016

  46. [46]

    A., Vaughan B

    Nowak M. A., Vaughan B. A., Wilms J., Dove J. B., Begelman M. C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306610 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...510..874N 510, 874

    work page doi:10.1086/306610 1999

  47. [47]

    A., McClintock J

    Orosz J. A., McClintock J. E., Aufdenberg J. P., Remillard R. A., Reid M. J., Narayan R., Gou L., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/84 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742...84O 742, 84

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/84 2011

  48. [48]

    E., Nandra K., Kazanas D., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321722 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...554L.133P 554, L133

    Papadakis I. E., Nandra K., Kazanas D., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321722 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...554L.133P 554, L133

    work page doi:10.1086/321722 2001

  49. [49]

    L., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/9 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808....9P 808, 9

    Parker M. L., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/9 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808....9P 808, 9

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/1/9 2015

  50. [50]

    L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821L...6P 821, L6

    Parker M. L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821L...6P 821, L6

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/l6 2016

  51. [51]

    Rapisarda S., Ingram A., Kalamkar M., van der Klis M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1878 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.4078R 462, 4078

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1878 2016

  52. [52]

    Rapisarda S., Ingram A., van der Klis M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2110 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.3821R 472, 3821

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2110 2017

  53. [53]

    J., McClintock J

    Reid M. J., McClintock J. E., Narayan R., Gou L., Remillard R. A., Orosz J. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/83 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742...83R 742, 83

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/83 2011

  54. [54]

    Revnivtsev M., Gilfanov M., Churazov E., 1999, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A

    work page 1999

  55. [55]

    S., Young A

    Reynolds C. S., Young A. J., Begelman M. C., Fabian A. C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306913 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...514..164R 514, 164

    work page doi:10.1086/306913 1999

  56. [56]

    A., okas E

    Ross R. R., Fabian A. C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08797.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358..211R 358, 211

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08797.x 2005

  57. [57]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A

    work page 1973

  58. [58]

    Stella L., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1038/344747a0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990Natur.344..747S 344, 747

    work page doi:10.1038/344747a0 1990

  59. [59]

    A., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174934 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...436..599S 436, 599

    Svensson R., Zdziarski A. A., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174934 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...436..599S 436, 599

    work page doi:10.1086/174934 1994

  60. [60]

    W., Jethwa P., Karas V., Miniutti G., Guainazzi M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219701 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    Svoboda J., Dov c iak M., Goosmann R. W., Jethwa P., Karas V., Miniutti G., Guainazzi M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219701 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219701 2012

  61. [61]

    S., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaad63 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855..120T 855, 120

    Taylor C., Reynolds C. S., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaad63 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855..120T 855, 120

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaad63

  62. [62]

    S., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae9f2 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...868..109T 868, 109

    Taylor C., Reynolds C. S., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae9f2 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...868..109T 868, 109

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae9f2

  63. [63]

    S., Price R

    Thorne K. S., Price R. H., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/181720 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJ...195L.101T 195, L101

    work page doi:10.1086/181720 1975

  64. [64]

    A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/78 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780...78T 780, 78

    Tomsick J. A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/78 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780...78T 780, 78

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/1/78 2014

  65. [65]

    A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaab1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855....3T 855, 3

    Tomsick J. A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaab1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855....3T 855, 3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaaab1 2018

  66. [66]

    Uttley P., Wilkinson T., Cassatella P., Wilms J., Pottschmidt K., Hanke M., B \"o ck M., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01056.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.414L..60U 414, L60

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01056.x 2011

  67. [67]

    A., Nowak M

    Vaughan B. A., Nowak M. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310430 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...474L..43V 474, L43

    work page doi:10.1086/310430 1997

  68. [68]

    Veledina A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2556 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.4236V 481, 4236

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2556 2018

  69. [69]

    J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L23 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777L..23W 777, L23

    Walton D. J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L23 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777L..23W 777, L23

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/l23 2013

  70. [70]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/87 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826...87W 826, 87

    Walton D. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/87 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826...87W 826, 87

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/87 2016

  71. [71]

    R., Fabian A

    Wilkins D. R., Fabian A. C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts591 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430..247W 430, 247

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts591 2013

  72. [72]

    R., Cackett E

    Wilkins D. R., Cackett E. M., Fabian A. C., Reynolds C. S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw276 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458..200W 458, 200

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw276 2016

  73. [73]

    Wilms J., Allen A., McCray R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317016 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542..914W 542, 914

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/317016 2000

  74. [74]

    A., Pottschmidt K., Pooley G

    Wilms J., Nowak M. A., Pottschmidt K., Pooley G. G., Fritz S., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053938 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053938 2006

  75. [75]

    J., Reeves J

    Zoghbi A., Uttley P., Fabian A. C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17883.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.412...59Z 412, 59

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17883.x 2011

  76. [76]

    van der Klis M., Hasinger G., Stella L., Langmeier A., van Paradijs J., Lewin W. H. G., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184946 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...319L..13V 319, L13

    work page doi:10.1086/184946 1987