pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.08563 · v1 · pith:IIABJQ6Tnew · submitted 2019-06-20 · 💻 cs.RO

An observable time series based SLAM algorithm for deforming environment

Jingwei Song , Liang Zhao , Shoudong Huang , Gamini Dissanayake This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 19:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords SLAMdeforming environmentobservabilityEmbedded Deformation graphnon-rigid mappingtime seriesmotion priorsrobot localization
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Embedded Deformation graph used in non-rigid SLAM is unobservable and produces ambiguous solutions without motion priors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the back-end optimization in simultaneous localization and mapping when a robot must track both its own position and the changing shape of soft surfaces. Standard Embedded Deformation graph models turn out to be unobservable, so that robot motion cannot be cleanly separated from the environment's rigid and non-rigid movements. The authors therefore replace free-form deformation with a time-series constraint: the current shape is written as a linear combination of shapes observed at earlier instants. This regularity assumption supplies the missing priors. Monte Carlo simulations and real-robot trials show the resulting estimator recovers unique poses where both rigid SLAM and unmodified ED-graph SLAM fail under large deformation.

Core claim

The ED graph formulation is unobservable and admits multiple solutions unless suitable priors are supplied; a linear combination of several previous shapes supplies those priors, removes the ambiguity between camera motion and environment deformation, and yields an observable system whose effectiveness is confirmed by rank analysis of the Fisher information matrix.

What carries the argument

Linear combination of previous deformed shapes that approximates the current shape and thereby enforces temporal regularity on the environment motion.

If this is right

  • Robot pose and environment shape become separable once the linear-combination prior is imposed.
  • The same observability conclusion applies to any free-form deformation model.
  • Fisher information matrix rank analysis with a base case confirms the system is observable under the proposed prior.
  • The algorithm produces lower error than both rigid SLAM and standard ED-graph SLAM on large-deformation sequences.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same linear-combination idea could be tested on other parametric deformation models that currently lack temporal constraints.
  • Performance will depend on the number of retained previous shapes; an adaptive window size might be needed when motion regularity changes.
  • If the environment occasionally exhibits sudden non-regular events, a hybrid system that detects and relaxes the linear-combination assumption could maintain robustness.

Load-bearing premise

The deforming environment exhibits regular motion that permits approximation of the current shape by a linear combination of previous shapes.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the surface undergoes irregular, non-representable deformation (for example, sudden tearing or independent local motion not spanned by prior shapes) should produce a singular or rank-deficient Fisher information matrix and non-unique pose estimates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.08563 by Gamini Dissanayake, Jingwei Song, Liang Zhao, Shoudong Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: One step robot movement. Robot moves from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A typical feature deforming example. The ellipse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A simple example of 2 steps robot movement. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The two figures is an example of Monte Carlo simulation. Display area is illustrated from different directions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a), (b) and (c) shows the robot moves randomly inside a deformable organ (Heart, stomach and liver). Red curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Estimation errors of rigid SLAM and the proposed time-series SLAM. Row 1 to 3 are the tests on scenarios of heart, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Estimation errors of rigid SLAM and the proposed time-series SLAM. Row 1 to 3 are the tests on scenarios of heart, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ground truth dataset from Hamlyn center. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the back-end of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem in deforming environment, where robot localizes itself and tracks multiple non-rigid soft surface using its onboard sensor measurements. An elaborate analysis is conducted on conventional deformation modelling method, Embedded Deformation (ED) graph. We demonstrate and prove that the ED graph widely used in such scenarios is unobservable and leads to multiple solutions unless suitable priors are provided. Example as well as theoretical prove are provided to show the ambiguity of ED graph and camera pose. In modelling non-rigid scenario with ED graph, motion priors of the deforming environment is essential to separate robot pose and deforming environment. The conclusion can be extrapolated to any free form deformation formulation. In solving the observability, this research proposes a preliminary deformable SLAM approach to estimate robot pose in complex environments that exhibits regular motion. A strategy that approximates deformed shape using a linear combination of several previous shapes is proposed to avoid the ambiguity in robot movement and rigid and non-rigid motions of the environment. Fisher information matrix rank analysis with a base case is discussed to prove the effectiveness. Moreover, the proposed algorithm is validated extensively on Monte Carlo simulations and real experiments. It is demonstrated that the new algorithm significantly outperforms conventional rigid SLAM and ED based SLAM especially in scenarios where there is large deformation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the back-end of SLAM in deforming environments, demonstrates that the Embedded Deformation (ED) graph is unobservable (leading to ambiguities between robot pose and non-rigid motion), proves this via example and Fisher information matrix rank analysis, and proposes a time-series prior that approximates the current deformed shape as a linear combination of several previous shapes to restore observability. The approach is validated on Monte Carlo simulations and real experiments, claiming significant outperformance over rigid SLAM and standard ED-based SLAM in large-deformation scenarios.

Significance. If the observability restoration via the linear-combination prior holds for the targeted class of regular deformations, the work identifies a fundamental modeling issue in ED-graph formulations and supplies a practical constraint that separates robot motion from environment deformation, which could improve reliability of non-rigid SLAM in robotics applications involving predictable soft-surface motion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fisher information matrix rank analysis] Fisher information matrix rank analysis section: the rank test is performed only on a base case that satisfies the linear-combination assumption; the manuscript does not demonstrate that the matrix remains full rank when a new independent deformation mode appears that is orthogonal to the span of the retained history, in which case the effective constraint matrix becomes rank-deficient and the original ambiguity between rigid camera motion and non-rigid surface motion reappears.
  2. [Observability analysis] Observability analysis and extrapolation claim (abstract and modeling section): while the example and internal rank analysis show ambiguity within the authors' linear-combination model, the assertion that the conclusion 'can be extrapolated to any free form deformation formulation' lacks a general argument and remains tied to the specific modeling choice rather than a model-independent proof.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the phrase 'theoretical prove' which should be corrected to 'theoretical proof'.
  2. [Proposed algorithm] Notation for the linear-combination coefficients and the number of retained previous shapes is introduced without an explicit sensitivity analysis; a brief discussion of how these hyperparameters are selected would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and assumptions of our observability analysis. We address each major point below, indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Fisher information matrix rank analysis] Fisher information matrix rank analysis section: the rank test is performed only on a base case that satisfies the linear-combination assumption; the manuscript does not demonstrate that the matrix remains full rank when a new independent deformation mode appears that is orthogonal to the span of the retained history, in which case the effective constraint matrix becomes rank-deficient and the original ambiguity between rigid camera motion and non-rigid surface motion reappears.

    Authors: We agree that the rank analysis was performed only on the base case satisfying the linear-combination assumption. This choice aligns with the paper's focus on regular deforming environments. When a new orthogonal deformation mode appears outside the span of retained history, the prior would indeed lose effectiveness and the ambiguity could reappear. We will revise the Fisher information matrix section to explicitly state this limitation and the conditions under which the time-series prior restores observability. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Observability analysis] Observability analysis and extrapolation claim (abstract and modeling section): while the example and internal rank analysis show ambiguity within the authors' linear-combination model, the assertion that the conclusion 'can be extrapolated to any free form deformation formulation' lacks a general argument and remains tied to the specific modeling choice rather than a model-independent proof.

    Authors: The provided example, ambiguity demonstration, and rank analysis are specific to the Embedded Deformation graph formulation. We acknowledge that no model-independent general proof is given for arbitrary free-form deformation models. We will revise the abstract and modeling section to remove the broad extrapolation claim and instead state that the unobservability issue arises in ED-graph (and similar) formulations without suitable motion priors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper first establishes unobservability of the standard ED graph via explicit example and rank analysis on the unconstrained formulation, then introduces an independent modeling assumption (linear combination of prior shapes) as a motion prior, and finally performs Fisher-information rank analysis on the augmented system that incorporates this prior. No step reduces a claimed prediction or observability result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by algebraic identity; the rank test is performed on the model that includes the stated prior rather than smuggling the conclusion into the definition of the base ED graph. The central claim therefore retains independent mathematical content outside its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption of regular motion allowing linear approximation; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Deforming environment exhibits regular motion permitting linear combination of previous shapes
    Invoked to separate robot pose from non-rigid motion in the proposed algorithm.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5778 in / 1165 out tokens · 24892 ms · 2026-05-25T19:47:39.930596+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Parallel tracking and mapping for small ar workspaces,

    G. Klein and D. Murray, “Parallel tracking and mapping for small ar workspaces,” in Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2007. ISMAR 2007. 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on , pp. 225–234, IEEE, 2007

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Kinectfusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking,

    R. A. Newcombe, S. Izadi, et al. , “Kinectfusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking,” in Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on , pp. 127–136, IEEE, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Lsd-slam: Large-scale di- rect monocular slam,

    J. Engel, T. Sch ¨ops, and D. Cremers, “Lsd-slam: Large-scale di- rect monocular slam,” in European Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 834–849, Springer, 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Orb-slam: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system,

    R. Mur-Artal, J. M. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardos, “Orb-slam: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1147–1163, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Bundle- fusion: Real-time globally consistent 3d reconstruction using on-the- fly surface reintegration,

    A. Dai, M. Nießner, M. Zollh ¨ofer, S. Izadi, and C. Theobalt, “Bundle- fusion: Real-time globally consistent 3d reconstruction using on-the- fly surface reintegration,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , vol. 36, no. 4, p. 76a, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Ekf monocular slam with relocalization for laparoscopic sequences,

    O. G. Grasa, J. Civera, and J. Montiel, “Ekf monocular slam with relocalization for laparoscopic sequences,” in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on , pp. 4816–4821, IEEE, 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Simultaneous tracking, 3d reconstruction and deforming point detection for stereo- scope guided surgery,

    B. Lin, A. Johnson, X. Qian, J. Sanchez, and Y . Sun, “Simultaneous tracking, 3d reconstruction and deforming point detection for stereo- scope guided surgery,” in Augmented Reality Environments for Medical Imaging and Computer-Assisted Interventions , pp. 35–44, Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Orbslam-based endoscope tracking and 3d reconstruction,

    N. Mahmoud, I. Cirauqui, A. Hostettler, C. Doignon, L. Soler, J. Marescaux, and J. Montiel, “Orbslam-based endoscope tracking and 3d reconstruction,” in International Workshop on Computer-Assisted and Robotic Endoscopy , pp. 72–83, Springer, 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    SLAM based Quasi Dense Reconstruction For Minimally Invasive Surgery Scenes

    N. Mahmoud, A. Hostettler, T. Collins, L. Soler, C. Doignon, and J. Montiel, “Slam based quasi dense reconstruction for minimally invasive surgery scenes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.09107 , 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    A non-rigid map fusion-based direct slam method for endoscopic capsule robots,

    M. Turan, Y . Almalioglu, H. Araujo, E. Konukoglu, and M. Sitti, “A non-rigid map fusion-based direct slam method for endoscopic capsule robots,” International journal of intelligent robotics and applications , vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 399–409, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Slam- based dense surface reconstruction in monocular minimally invasive surgery and its application to augmented reality,

    L. Chen, W. Tang, N. W. John, T. R. Wan, and J. J. Zhang, “Slam- based dense surface reconstruction in monocular minimally invasive surgery and its application to augmented reality,” Computer methods and programs in biomedicine , vol. 158, pp. 135–146, 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Live tracking and dense reconstruction for hand- held monocular endoscopy,

    N. Mahmoud, T. Collins, A. Hostettler, L. Soler, C. Doignon, and J. M. M. Montiel, “Live tracking and dense reconstruction for hand- held monocular endoscopy,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging , vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 79–89, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling,

    O. Sorkine and M. Alexa, “As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling,” in Symposium on Geometry Processing , vol. 4, pp. 109–116, 2007

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    Visual slam and structure from motion in dynamic environments: A survey,

    M. R. U. Saputra, A. Markham, and N. Trigoni, “Visual slam and structure from motion in dynamic environments: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , vol. 51, no. 2, p. 37, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Dynamicfusion: Recon- struction and tracking of non-rigid scenes in real-time,

    R. A. Newcombe, D. Fox, and S. M. Seitz, “Dynamicfusion: Recon- struction and tracking of non-rigid scenes in real-time,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 343–352, 2015

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    V olumedeform: Real-time volumetric non-rigid reconstruc- tion,

    M. Innmann, M. Zollh ¨ofer, M. Nießner, C. Theobalt, and M. Stam- minger, “V olumedeform: Real-time volumetric non-rigid reconstruc- tion,” in European Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 362–379, Springer, 2016

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Real-time geometry, albedo, and motion reconstruction using a single rgb-d camera,

    K. Guo, F. Xu, T. Yu, X. Liu, Q. Dai, and Y . Liu, “Real-time geometry, albedo, and motion reconstruction using a single rgb-d camera,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , vol. 36, no. 3, p. 32, 2017

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Fusion4d: real-time performance capture of challenging scenes,

    M. Dou, S. Khamis, et al. , “Fusion4d: real-time performance capture of challenging scenes,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 35, no. 4, p. 114, 2016

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Dynamic reconstruction of deformable soft-tissue with stereo scope in minimal invasive surgery,

    J. Song, J. Wang, L. Zhao, S. Huang, and G. Dissanayake, “Dynamic reconstruction of deformable soft-tissue with stereo scope in minimal invasive surgery,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 155–162, 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    MIS-SLAM: Real-time Large Scale Dense Deformable SLAM System in Minimal Invasive Surgery Based on Heterogeneous Computing

    J. Song, J. Wang, L. Zhao, S. Huang, and G. Dissanayake, “Mis- slam: Real-time large scale dense deformable slam system in minimal invasive surgery based on heterogeneous computing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02009, 2018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Fem models to code non- rigid ekf monocular slam,

    A. Agudo, B. Calvo, and J. Montiel, “Fem models to code non- rigid ekf monocular slam,” in Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2011 IEEE International Conference on , pp. 1586–1593, IEEE, 2011

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    3d reconstruction of non-rigid surfaces in real-time using wedge elements,

    A. Agudo, B. Calvo, and J. Montiel, “3d reconstruction of non-rigid surfaces in real-time using wedge elements,” in European Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 113–122, Springer, 2012

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Bar-Shalom, X

    Y . Bar-Shalom, X. R. Li, and T. Kirubarajan, Estimation with appli- cations to tracking and navigation: theory algorithms and software . John Wiley & Sons, 2004

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    Solvability, controllability, and observability of continuous descriptor systems,

    E. Yip and R. Sincovec, “Solvability, controllability, and observability of continuous descriptor systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 702–707, 1981

    work page 1981

  25. [25]

    Thrun, W

    S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox, Probabilistic robotics. MIT press, 2005

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    Embedded deformation for shape manipulation,

    R. W. Sumner, J. Schmid, and M. Pauly, “Embedded deformation for shape manipulation,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , vol. 26, no. 3, p. 80, 2007

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Force-based representation for non-rigid shape and elastic model estimation,

    A. Agudo and F. Moreno-Noguer, “Force-based representation for non-rigid shape and elastic model estimation,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 2137– 2150, 2017

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Robust spatio-temporal clustering and reconstruction of multiple deformable bodies,

    A. Agudo and F. Moreno-Noguer, “Robust spatio-temporal clustering and reconstruction of multiple deformable bodies,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 971– 984, 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Dense variational reconstruc- tion of non-rigid surfaces from monocular video,

    R. Garg, A. Roussos, and L. Agapito, “Dense variational reconstruc- tion of non-rigid surfaces from monocular video,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 1272–1279, 2013

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    General trajectory prior for non-rigid reconstruction,

    J. Valmadre and S. Lucey, “General trajectory prior for non-rigid reconstruction,” in 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1394–1401, IEEE, 2012

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Separable spatiotemporal priors for convex reconstruction of time-varying 3d point clouds,

    T. Simon, J. Valmadre, I. Matthews, and Y . Sheikh, “Separable spatiotemporal priors for convex reconstruction of time-varying 3d point clouds,” in European Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 204– 219, Springer, 2014

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Trust-region methods on riemannian manifolds,

    P.-A. Absil, C. G. Baker, and K. A. Gallivan, “Trust-region methods on riemannian manifolds,” F oundations of Computational Mathematics , vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 303–330, 2007

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Conver- gence and consistency analysis for a 3-d invariant-ekf slam,

    T. Zhang, K. Wu, J. Song, S. Huang, and G. Dissanayake, “Conver- gence and consistency analysis for a 3-d invariant-ekf slam,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 733–740, 2017

    work page 2017